Cited by 34Malaria Research and ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersBird parasitology and diseases

Submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum infections during pregnancy, in an area of Sudan with a low intensity of malaria transmission

Adam, I., A-Elbasit, I. E., Salih, I., Elbashir, M. I.·2005·Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology

Abstract

There are few published studies on the burden of malaria during pregnancy from areas of sub-Saharan Africa where the intensity of malarial transmission is low, and few on submicroscopic malarial infections in pregnant women. The present study was conducted in New Halfa, an area of low-intensity transmission in eastern Sudan, between August 2003 and July 2004. The main aims were to assess the prevalences of submicroscopic and multiple Plasmodium falciparum infections in pregnant women (using the P. falciparum merozoite surface protein-2 as a polymorphic marker in PCR-based assays) and to determine the effects of such infections on anaemia during pregnancy. Of the 142 pregnant women who were recruited, only 17 (11.9%) were found smear-positive for P. falciparum by microscopy. The results of the PCR-based assays revealed, however, that 40 (32%) of the 125 smear-negative women had submicroscopic P. falciparum infections. Blood samples from 32 (80%) of those with submicroscopic infections showed only the FC 27 allele (of merozoite surface protein-2), six (15%) showed only the ICI allele, and two (5%) showed both of these alleles. Although the age, parity, gestational age and haemoglobin concentrations of the women with submicroscopic P. falciparum infections were not significantly different from those of the women who were smear- and PCR-negative, such infections may have a significant impact on materno-foetal health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/136485905x36244

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whether applied to peripheral blood or placental blood samples, PCR methods yield positivity rates 20% or more above those of blood smear microscopy.

    “Whether applied to peripheral blood or placental blood samples, PCR methods yield positivity rates 20% or more above those of BS microscopy (Tables 3 & 4) [10,14–16,38–46].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adam, I., A-Elbasit, I. E., Salih, I., & Elbashir, M. I.
Affiliations
  • New Halfa Teaching HospitalP.O. Box 61, New Halfa, Sudan
  • University of Khartoum (SD)
Venue
Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology
Published
2005-06
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
339-344
ISSN
  • 0003-4983 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-8594
OpenAlex
W2087744036
Cited by
34
References
20
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
Keywords
Plasmodium falciparum, submicroscopic malaria infection, malaria in pregnancy, merozoite surface protein 2
MeSH terms
Adult, Anemia, Animals, Female, Hemoglobins, Humans, Parity, Plasmodium falciparum, Pregnancy, Sudan, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Prevalence, DNA, Protozoan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Malaria, Falciparum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review