The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Epidemiology of Postpartum Hemorrhage in a Large, Nationwide Sample of Deliveries
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to (1) define trends in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and (2) elucidate the contemporary epidemiology of PPH focusing on risk factors and maternal outcomes related to this delivery complication. METHODS: Hospital admissions for delivery were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest discharge dataset in the United States. Using International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ninth revision) codes, deliveries complicated by PPH were identified, as were comorbid conditions that may be risk factors for PPH. Temporal trends in the incidence of PPH from 1995 to 2004 were assessed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the most common etiology of PPH-uterine atony. RESULTS: In 2004, PPH complicated 2.9% of all deliveries; uterine atony accounted for 79% of the cases of PPH. PPH was associated with 19.1% of all in-hospital deaths after delivery. The overall rate of PPH increased 27.5% from 1995 to 2004, primarily because of an increase in the incidence of uterine atony; the rates of PPH from other causes including retained placenta and coagulopathy remained relatively stable during the study period. Logistic regression modeling identified age <20 or > or =40 years, cesarean delivery, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, polyhydramnios, chorioamnionitis, multiple gestation, retained placenta, and antepartum hemorrhage as independent risk factors for PPH from uterine atony that resulted in transfusion. Excluding maternal age and cesarean delivery, one or more of these risk factors were present in only 38.8% of these patients. CONCLUSION: PPH is a relatively common complication of delivery and is associated with substantial maternal morbidity and mortality. It is increasing in frequency in the United States. PPH caused by uterine atony resulting in transfusion often occurs in the absence of recognized risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Risk factors for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study
Nyfløt, L. T., Sandven, I., Stray-Pedersen, B., Pettersen, S., Al-Zirqi, I., Rosenberg, M., Jacobsen, A. F., & Vangen, S. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1217-0 · Cited by 312
Shields, L. E., Wiesner, S., Fulton, J., & Pelletreau, B. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.012 · Cited by 276
Postpartum haemorrhage: prevention and treatment
Sentilhes, L., Merlot, B., Madar, H., Sztark, F., Brun, S., & Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2016) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2016.1245135 · Cited by 153
Massive blood transfusion during hospitalization for delivery in New York State, 1998-2007
Mhyre, J. M., Shilkrut, A., Kuklina, E. V., Callaghan, W. M., Creanga, A. A., Kaminsky, S., & Bateman, B. T. (2013) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000021 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Bateman, B. T., Berman, M. F., Riley, L. E., & Leffert, L. R.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1368-1373
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033605703
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Epidemiology of Postpartum Hemorrhage in a Large, Nationwide Sample of Deliveries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181d74898
- The paper
- Bateman, B. T., Berman, M. F., Riley, L. E., & Leffert, L. R. (2010). The Epidemiology of Postpartum Hemorrhage in a Large, Nationwide Sample of Deliveries. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181d74898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.