Cited by 91Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumSexual function and dysfunction studies

Women’s psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review

Open access
Benton, Madeleine, Salter, Amy, Tape, Nicole, Wilkinson, Chris, Turnbull, Deborah·2019·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

Background: Given the sudden and unexpected nature of an emergency caesarean section (EmCS) coupled with an increased risk of psychological distress, it is particularly important to understand the psychosocial outcomes for women. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify, collate and examine the evidence surrounding women’s psychosocial outcomes of EmCS worldwide. Methods: The electronic databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched between November 2017 and March 2018. To ensure articles were reflective of original and recently published research, the search criteria included peer-reviewed research articles published within the last 20 years (1998 to 2018). All study designs were included if they incorporated an examination of women’s psychosocial outcomes after EmCS. Due to inherent heterogeneity of study data, extraction and synthesis of both qualitative and quantitative data pertaining to key psychosocial outcomes were organised into coherent themes and analysis was attempted. Results: In total 17,189 articles were identified. Of these, 208 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. One hundred forty-nine articles were further excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 66 articles in the current systematic literature review. While meta-analyses were not possible due to the nature of the heterogeneity, key psychosocial outcomes identified that were negatively impacted by EmCS included post-traumatic stress, health-related quality of life, experiences, infant-feeding, satisfaction, and self-esteem. Post-traumatic stress was one of the most commonly examined psychosocial outcomes, with a strong consensus that EmCS contributes to both symptoms and diagnosis. Conclusions: EmCS was found to negatively impact several psychosocial outcomes for women in particular post-traumatic stress. While investment in technologies and clinical practice to minimise the number of EmCSs is crucial, further investigations are needed to develop effective strategies to prepare and support women who experience this type of birth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-019-2687-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who undergo EmCS experience sudden physiological changes and high psychological stress reactions due to the intricacy, risks, and urgency.

    “Women who undergo EmCS experience sudden physiological changes and endure high psychological stress reactions due to the intricacy, risks, and urgency associated with this condition.”

    From The traumatic childbirth experience of mothers after emergency cesarean section(EmCS) in China: a descriptive qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction describes EmCS as typically urgent and says its complexity and rapid psychological adjustments may be distressing. The Results (Key outcomes, Traumatic stress) report that EmCS contributes to post-traumatic stress symptoms. The paper does not describe sudden physiological changes in women undergoing EmCS; its reference to rapid changes concerns psychological adjustments. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Compared to elective cesarean section or natural birth, EmCS is more likely to be perceived as traumatic childbirth, which can subsequently lead to psychological trauma.

    “Compared to elective cesarean section or natural birth, EmCS is more likely to be perceived as traumatic childbirth, which can subsequently lead to psychological trauma [2–4].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. [1]Mazzoni A Althabe F Liu NH Bonotti AM Gibbons L Sanchez AJ Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Bjog 2011 118 4 391 399 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x 21134103 PMC3312015 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Betrán AP Ye J Moller A-B Zhang J Gülmezoglu AM Torloni MR The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014 PLoS One 2016 11 2 e0148343 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 26849801 PMC4743929 · DOI
  3. [4]Boerma T Ronsmans C Melesse DY Barros AJD Barros FC Juan L Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections Lancet 2018 392 10155 1341 1348 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7 30322584 · DOI
  4. [5]Zanardo V Soldera G Volpe F Giliberti L Parotto M Giustardi A Straface G Influence of elective and emergency cesarean delivery on mother emotions and bonding Early Hum Dev 2016 99 17 20 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.05.006 27380109 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]le Riche H Hall D Non-elective caesarean section: how long do we take to deliver? J Trop Pediatr 2005 51 2 78 81 10.1093/tropej/fmh082 15840759 · DOI
  6. [8]Lobel MD R. S. Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: review and analysis of their causes and implications Soc Sci Med 2007 64 11 2272 2284 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.028 17395349 · DOI
  7. [9]Somera MJ Feeley N Ciofani L Women's experience of an emergency caesarean birth J Clin Nurs 2010 19 19–20 2824 2831 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03230.x 20731753 · DOI
  8. [10]Roux SL van Rensburg E South African mothers' perceptions and experiences of an unplanned caesarean section J Psychol Afr 2011 21 3 429 438 10.1080/14330237.2011.10820477 · DOI
  9. [11]Clement S Psychological aspects of caesarean section Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001 15 1 109 126 10.1053/beog.2000.0152 11359318 · DOI
  10. [12]Haines HM Rubertsson C Pallant JF Hildingsson I The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 12 1 55 10.1186/1471-2393-12-55 22727217 PMC3449179 · DOI
  11. [13]Nilver H Begley C Berg M Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 17 1 203 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y 28662645 PMC5492707 · DOI
  12. [14]Liberati A Altman DG Tetzlaff J Mulrow C Gøtzsche PC Ioannidis JPA The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration PLoS Med 2009 6 7 e1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 19621070 PMC2707010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman DG The PG Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement PLoS Med 2009 6 7 e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072 PMC2707599 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [17]Long J Cumming J Gellman MD Turner JR Psychosocial predictors Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine 2013 New York Springer New York 1584 1585
  15. [18]Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide: McGraw-hill education; 2014.
  16. [19]Timmins F McCabe C How to conduct an effective literature search Nurs Stand 2005 20 11 41 47 10.7748/ns.20.11.41.s53 16320963 · DOI
  17. [20]Horsley T Hyde C Santesso N Parkes J Milne R Stewart R Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 11 CD001270 PMC7389530 22071800
  18. [22]Boerleider AW Wiegers TA Manniën J Francke AL Devillé WL Factors affecting the use of prenatal care by non-western women in industrialized western countries: a systematic review BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013 13 1 81 10.1186/1471-2393-13-81 23537172 PMC3626532 · DOI
  19. [23]Adams SSE-G M. Sandvik ÅR Eskild A Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: A cohort study of 55 814 women BJOG 2012 119 3 298 305 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03188.x 22082191 · DOI
  20. [24]Adewuya AO Ologun YA Ibigbami OS Post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth in Nigerian women: prevalence and risk factors BJOG 2006 113 3 284 288 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00861.x 16487199 · DOI
  21. [25]Ahluwalia IB Li R Morrow B Breastfeeding practices: does method of delivery matter? Matern Child Health J 2012 16 Suppl 2 231 237 10.1007/s10995-012-1093-9 22926268 · DOI
  22. [26]Beck CT Watson S Impact of birth trauma on breast-feeding: A tale of two pathways Nurs Res 2008 57 4 228 236 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313494.87282.90 18641491 · DOI
  23. [27]Baas CI Wiegers TA de Cock TP Erwich JJ Spelten ER de Boer MR Client-related factors associated with a "less than good" experience of midwifery care during childbirth in the Netherlands Birth 2017 44 1 58 67 10.1111/birt.12266 27905662 · DOI
  24. [28]Baston H Marlies R Green JM Buitendijk S Looking back on birth three years later: factors associated with a negative appraisal in England and in the Netherlands J Reprod Infant Psychol 2008 26 4 323 339 10.1080/02646830802408480 · DOI
  25. [29]Bergant AM Moser R Heim K Ulmer H Burden of childbirth: associations with obstetric and psychosocial factors Arch Women’s Mental Health 1998 1 2 77 81 10.1007/s007370050009 · DOI
  26. [30]Bryanton J Gagnon AJ Johnston C Hatem M Predictors of women's perceptions of the childbirth experience J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008 37 1 24 34 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00203.x 18226154 · DOI
  27. [31]Burcher P Cheyney MJ Li KN Hushmendy S Kiley KC Cesarean birth regret and dissatisfaction: A qualitative approach Birth 2016 43 4 346 352 10.1111/birt.12240 27411933 · DOI
  28. [32]Carquillat P Boulvain M Guittier MJ How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women’s childbirth experiences? Midwifery 2016 43 21 28 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.002 27825057 · DOI
  29. [33]Chen CH Wang SY Psychosocial outcomes of vaginal and cesarean births in Taiwanese primiparas Res Nurs Health 2002 25 6 452 458 10.1002/nur.10056 12424782 · DOI
  30. [34]Creedy DK Shochet IM Horsfall J Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors Birth 2000 27 2 104 111 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00104.x 11251488 · DOI
  31. [35]Durik AM Hyde JS Clark R Sequelae of cesarean and vaginal deliveries: psychosocial outcomes for mothers and infants Dev Psychol 2000 36 2 251 260 10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.251 10749082 · DOI
  32. [36]Eckerdal P, Georgakis MK, Kollia N, Wikström AK, Högberg U, Skalkidou A. Delineating the association between mode of delivery and postpartum depression symptoms: A longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018. 29215162
  33. [37]Enabudoso EI A. R. Determinants of patient satisfaction after cesarean delivery at a university teaching hospital in Nigeria Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011 114 3 251 254 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.010 21696726 · DOI
  34. [38]Fenaroli V Saita E Molgora S Accordini M Italian women’s childbirth: a prospective longitudinal study of delivery predictors and subjective experience J Reprod Infant Psychol 2016 34 3 235 246 10.1080/02646838.2016.1167864 · DOI
  35. [39]Fenwick S Holloway I Alexander J Achieving normality: The key to status passage to motherhood after a caesarean section Midwifery 2009 25 5 554 563 10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.002 18191007 · DOI
  36. [40]Forti-Buratti MA Palanca-Maresca I Fajardo-Simón L Olza-Fernández I Bravo-Ortiz MF Marín-Gabriel MÁ Differences in mother-to-infant bonding according to type of C-section: elective versus unplanned Early Hum Dev 2017 115 93 98 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.09.020 29032281 · DOI
  37. [41]Furuta M Sandall J Cooper D Bick D Predictors of birth-related post-traumatic stress symptoms: secondary analysis of a cohort study Arch Women's Ment Health 2016 19 6 987 999 10.1007/s00737-016-0639-z 27178126 · DOI
  38. [42]Gamble J Creedy D Psychological trauma symptoms of operative birth Br J Midwifery 2005 13 4 218 224 10.12968/bjom.2005.13.4.17981 · DOI
  39. [43]Gaillard A Le Strat Y Mandelbrot L Keïta H Dubertret C Predictors of postpartum depression: prospective study of 264 women followed during pregnancy and postpartum Psychiatry Res 2014 215 2 341 346 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.003 24370337 · DOI
  40. [44]Gibbins JT A. M. Women's expectations and experiences of childbirth Midwifery 2001 17 4 302 313 10.1054/midw.2001.0263 11749063 · DOI
  41. [45]Goker A, Yanikkerem E, Demet, M. M.; Dikayak, S.; Yildirim, Y.; Koyuncu, F. M. Postpartum depression: is mode of delivery a risk factor? ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMC3530850 23304542
  42. [46]Graham WJ Hundley V McCheyne AL Hall MH Gurney E Milne J An investigation of women’s involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999 106 3 213 220 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08233.x 10426639 · DOI
  43. [47]Guittier MJ Cedraschi C Jamei N Boulvain M Guillemin F Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in first-time mothers: a qualitative study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 14 254 10.1186/1471-2393-14-254 25080994 PMC4132899 · DOI
  44. [48]Handelzalts Jonathan E. Waldman Peyser Avigail Krissi Haim Levy Sigal Wiznitzer Arnon Peled Yoav Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience PLOS ONE 2017 12 1 e0169132 10.1371/journal.pone.0169132 28046019 PMC5207782 · DOI
  45. [49]Herishanu-Gilutz S Shahar G Schattner E Kofman O Holcberg G On becoming a first-time mother after an emergency caesarean section: A journey from alienation to symbolic adoption J Health Psychol 2009 14 7 967 981 10.1177/1359105309341205 19786523 · DOI
  46. [50]Hobbs AJ Mannion CA McDonald SW Brockway M Tough SC The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016 16 90 10.1186/s12884-016-0876-1 27118118 PMC4847344 · DOI
  47. [51]Iwata H Mori E Tsuchiya M Sakajo A Maehara K Ozawa H Morita A Maekawa T Aoki K Makaya M Tamakoshi K Predicting early post-partum depressive symptoms among older primiparous Japanese mothers Jpn J Nurs Sci 2015 12 4 297 308 10.1111/jjns.12069 25720953 · DOI
  48. [52]Jansen AJ Duvekot JJ Hop WC Essink-Bot ML Beckers EA Karsdorp VH Scherjon SA Steegers EA van Rhenen DJ New insights into fatigue and health-related quality of life after delivery Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007 86 5 579 584 10.1080/00016340701275424 17464587 · DOI
  49. [53]Karlstrom A Women’s self-reported experience of unplanned caesarean section: results of a Swedish study Midwifery 2017 50 253 258 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.016 28505479 · DOI
  50. [54]Karlstrom A Engström‐Olofsson R Norbergh KG Sjoling M Hildingsson I Postoperative pain after cesarean birth affects breastfeeding and infant care J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2007 36 5 430 440 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00160.x 17880313 · DOI
  51. [55]Loto OM Adewuya AO Ajenifuja OK Orji EO Owolabi AT Ogunniyi SO The effect of caesarean section on self-esteem amongst primiparous women in South-Western Nigeria: a case-control study J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009 22 9 765 769 10.3109/14767050902801660 19544153 · DOI
  52. [56]Loto OM Adewuya AO Ajenifuja OK Orji EO Ayandiran EO Owolabi AT Ade-Ojo IP Cesarean section in relation to self-esteem and parenting among new mothers in southwestern Nigeria Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010 89 1 35 38 10.3109/00016340903280966 19824868 · DOI
  53. [57]Lurie S Aizenberg M Sulema V Boaz M Kovo M Golan A Sadan O Sexual function after childbirth by the mode of delivery: a prospective study Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013 288 4 785 792 10.1007/s00404-013-2846-4 23589124 · DOI
  54. [58]Maclean LI McDermott MR May CP Method of delivery and subjective distress: Women's emotional responses to childbirth practices J Reprod Infant Psychol 2000 18 2 153 162 10.1080/02646830050008396 · DOI
  55. [59]Modarres M, Afrasiabi S, Rahnama P, Montazeri A. Prevalence and risk factors of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress symptoms. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12. PMC3512536 22938705
  56. [60]Noyman-Veksler G Herishanu-Gilutz S Kofman O Holchberg G Shahar G Post-natal psychopathology and bonding with the infant among first-time mothers undergoing a caesarian section and vaginal delivery: sense of coherence and social support as moderators Psychol Health 2015 30 4 441 455 10.1080/08870446.2014.977281 25325733 · DOI
  57. [61]O’Reilly Aminata Choby Delphine Séjourné Natalène Callahan Stacey Feelings of control, unconditional self-acceptance and maternal self-esteem in women who had delivered by caesarean Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2014 32 4 355 365 10.1080/02646838.2014.930111 · DOI
  58. [62]Patel R Murphy DJ Peters TJ Operative delivery and postnatal depression: A cohort study Br Med J 2005 330 7496 879 881 10.1136/bmj.38376.603426.D3 15734748 PMC556158 · DOI
  59. [63]Porter M Van Teijlingen E Chi Ying Yip L Bhattacharya S Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey Birth 2007 34 2 148 154 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00161.x 17542819 · DOI
  60. [64]Redshaw M Hockley C Institutional processes and individual responses: Women's experiences of care in relation to cesarean birth Birth 2010 37 2 150 159 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00395.x 20557538 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [65]Rowlands IJ, Redshaw M. Mode of birth and women's psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12. PMC3533875 23190575
  62. [67]Ryding EL Wijma K Wijma B Psychological impact of emergency cesarean section in comparison with elective cesarean section, instrumental and normal vaginal delivery J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1998 19 3 135 144 10.3109/01674829809025691 9844844 · DOI
  63. [68]Ryding EL Wijma K Wijma B Emergency cesarean section: 25 Women's experiences J Reprod Infant Psychol 2000 18 1 33 39 10.1080/02646830050001663 · DOI
  64. [69]Safarinejad MR Kolahi AA Hosseini L The effect of the mode of delivery on the quality of life, sexual function, and sexual satisfaction in primiparous women and their husbands J Sex Med 2009 6 6 1645 1667 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01232.x 19473472 · DOI
  65. [70]Saisto T Salmela Aro K Nurmi JE Halmesmäki E Psychosocial predictors of disappointment with delivery and puerperal depression: A longitudinal study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001 80 1 39 45 11167187
  66. [71]Sarah SB Forozan SP Leila D The relationship between model of delivery and postpartum depression Ann Trop Med Public Health 2017 10 4 874 877 10.4103/ATMPH.ATMPH_236_17 · DOI
  67. [72]Shorten A Shorten B Kennedy HP Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis Birth 2014 41 2 178 184 10.1111/birt.12082 24702477 · DOI
  68. [73]Soderquist J Wijma K Wijma B Traumatic stress after childbirth: the role of obstetric variables J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2002 23 1 31 39 10.3109/01674820209093413 12061035 · DOI
  69. [74]Spaich S Welzel G Berlit S Temerinac D Tuschy B Sütterlin M Kehl S Mode of delivery and its influence on women's satisfaction with childbirth Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol 2013 170 2 401 406 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.040 23962715 · DOI
  70. [75]Storksen HT Garthus‐Niegel S Vangen S Eberhard-Gran M The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013 92 3 318 324 10.1111/aogs.12072 23278249 · DOI
  71. [76]Tham V Christensson K Ryding EL Sense of coherence and symptoms of post-traumatic stress after emergency caesarean section Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007 86 9 1090 1096 10.1080/00016340701507693 17712650 · DOI
  72. [77]Tham V Ryding EL Christensson K Experience of support among mothers with and without post-traumatic stress symptoms following emergency caesarean section Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare 2010 1 4 175 180 10.1016/j.srhc.2010.06.004 21122618 · DOI
  73. [78]Triviño-Juárez JM Romero-Ayuso D Nieto-Pereda B Forjaz MJ Criado-Álvarez JJ Arruti-Sevilla B Avilés-Gamez B Oliver-Barrecheguren C Mellizo-Díaz S Soto-Lucía C Plá-Mestre R Health related quality of life of women at the sixth week and sixth month postpartum by mode of birth Women Birth 2017 30 1 29 39 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.06.005 27353728 · DOI
  74. [79]Tully KP Ball HL Misrecognition of need: Women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery Soc Sci Med 2013 85 103 111 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.039 23540373 PMC3613981 · DOI · Paper page
  75. [80]Ukpong DIO A. T. Postpartum emotional distress: A controlled study of Nigerian women after caesarean childbirth J Obstet Gynaecol 2006 26 2 127 129 10.1080/01443610500443386 16483968 · DOI
  76. [81]Vossbeck-Elsebusch ANF, C.; Ehring, T. Predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms following childbirth. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1). PMC4223528 25026966
  77. [82]Wijma K Ryding EL Wijma B Predicting psychological well-being after emergency caesarean section: A preliminary study Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2002 20 1 25 36 10.1080/02646830220106776 · DOI
  78. [83]Wiklund I Edman G Ryding EL Andolf E Expectation and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2008 115 3 324 331 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01564.x 18190368 · DOI
  79. [84]Wiklund I Edman G Larsson C Andolf E First-time mothers and changes in personality in relation to mode of delivery J Adv Nurs 2009 65 8 1636 1644 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05018.x 19602011 · DOI
  80. [85]Xie RH Lei J Wang S Xie H Walker M Wen SW Cesarean section and postpartum depression in a cohort of Chinese women with a high cesarean delivery rate J Women's Health (Larchmt) 2011 20 12 1881 1886 10.1089/jwh.2011.2842 21877916 · DOI
  81. [86]Yang Szu-Nian Shen Lih-Jong Ping Tao Wang Yu-Chun Chien Ching-Wen The delivery mode and seasonal variation are associated with the development of postpartum depression Journal of Affective Disorders 2011 132 1-2 158 164 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.009 21377210 · DOI
  82. [87]Yang SN Shen LJ Ping T Wang YC Chien CW The delivery mode and seasonal variation are associated with the development of postpartum depression J Affect Disord 2011 132 1–2 158 164 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.009 21377210 · DOI
  83. [88]Adewuya AO Ologun YA Ibigbami OS Post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth in Nigerian women: prevalence and risk factors BJOG. 2006 113 3 284 288 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00861.x 16487199 · DOI
  84. [89]Wiklund I Edman G Larsson C Andolf E Personality and mode of delivery Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006 85 10 1225 1230 10.1080/00016340600839833 17068682 · DOI
  85. [90]Baas CI Wiegers TA de Cock TP Erwich JJHM Spelten ER de Boer MR Client-related factors associated with a “less than good” experience of midwifery care during childbirth in the Netherlands Birth. 2017 44 1 58 67 10.1111/birt.12266 27905662 · DOI
  86. [92]Dankner R Goldberg RP Fisch RZ Crum RM Cultural elements of postpartum depression. A study of 327 Jewish Jerusalem women J Reprod Med 2000 45 2 97 104 10710738
  87. [93]DiMatteo MR Morton SC Lepper HS Damush TM Carney MF Pearson M Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis Health Psychol 1996 15 4 303 314 10.1037/0278-6133.15.4.303 8818678 · DOI · Paper page
  88. [94]Larkin P Begley CM Devane D Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis Midwifery. 2009 25 2 e49 e59 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.010 17996342 · DOI
  89. [95]Shaw E Levitt C Wong S Kaczorowski J The McMaster University postpartum research G. systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: effectiveness of postpartum support to improve maternal parenting, mental health, quality of life, and physical health Birth. 2006 33 3 210 220 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00106.x 16948721 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benton, M., Salter, A., Tape, N., Wilkinson, C., & Turnbull, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Women's and Children's Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Benton, Madeleine
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2019-12
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
535-535
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997047863
Cited by
91
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Adelaide
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1129648)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
emergency cesarean section, psychosocial outcomes, post-traumatic stress, health-related quality of life, infant feeding, patient satisfaction, self-esteem, maternal mental health, childbirth experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Emergency Treatment, Female, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Pregnancy, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review