Cited by 33Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychometric properties of the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in Greek women after cesarean section

Open access
Orovou, Eirini, Theodoropoulou, Irina Mrvoljak, Antoniou, Evangelia·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine psychometric properties of the revised Posttraumatic Stress Checklist (PCL-5) for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual– 5 th Edition (DSM-5) in Greek postpartum women after Cesarean Section(CS) (emergency-elective).So far, there was no study in Greece assessing psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in women after CS. The participating women ( N = 469), who gave birth with emergency and elective CS at the Greek University Hospital of Larisa, have consented to participate in two phases of the survey and completed self-report questionnaires, the 2 nd day after CS and at the 6 th week after CS. Measures used in this study were the PCL-5 for DSM-5, the Life Events Checklist (LEC-5), Criteria B, C, D, E, and Criterion A, specifically designed for detection of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in postpartum period. To evaluate the internal reliability of the PCL-5 two different indices of internal consistency were calculated, i.e., Cronbach’s alpha (.97) and Guttman’ssplit-half (.95), demonstrating high reliability level. The data were positively skewed, suggesting that the reported levels of PTSD among our participants were low. Factor analyses demonstrated acceptable construct validity; a comparison of thePCL-5 with the other measures of the same concept showed a good convergent validity of the scale. Overall, all the results suggest that the four-factor PCL-5 seemed to work adequately for the Greek sample of women after CS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0255689

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PCL-5 is a well-validated self-report measure and shows strong correspondence with clinical diagnostics.

    “the PCL-5, which is a well validated self-report measure 34,51,64,65 and shows strong correspondence with clinical diagnostics34”

    From AI and narrative embeddings detect PTSD following childbirth via birth stories (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Measures section identifies the PCL-5 as a self-report tool, and the Results and Discussion report strong reliability and convergent validity in Greek women after cesarean section. The Scale validity results show correlations with PTSD criteria, but the paper does not establish strong correspondence with clinician-made diagnoses; that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Treatment (US) C for SA. Exhibit 1.3–4, DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for PTSD [Internet]. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207191/.
  2. F Weathers, 1993, The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility., Pap Present Annu Conv Int Soc Trauma Stress Stud
  3. JW Osborne, 2014, Best practices in exloratory factor analysis

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Orovou, E., Theodoropoulou, I. M., & Antoniou, E.
Affiliations
University of West Attica (GR)
Corresponding author
Orovou, Eirini
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-08-13
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
e0255689
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188777845
Cited by
31
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Thessaly
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, PCL-5, cesarean section, postpartum women, psychometric properties, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent validity, Life Events Checklist, emergency cesarean section, Greek women
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Greece, Hospitals, University, Humans, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Elective Surgical Procedures, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Postpartum Period, Checklist, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review