Cited by 1Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Anesthesia mode for cesarean delivery and maternal-infant bonding: a single-center cross-sectional study

Azbarga, Aram, Wainstock, Tamar, Binyamin, Yair, Sheiner, Eyal, Reuveni, Inbal, Pariente, Gali·2026·International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

Abstract

Background Mother-infant bonding is central to early infant development and maternal well-being. The mode of anesthesia for cesarean delivery may influence maternal recovery, early contact with the newborn, and the postpartum psychological experience. This study aimed to assess the association between mode of anesthesia for cesarean delivery and mother-infant bonding, and its relationship with risk of postpartum depression and early anxiety symptoms. Methods In this cross-sectional study, women were recruited 1 to 3 days after cesarean delivery at Soroka University Medical Center. Eligible participants had delivered a live-born singleton term infant. During hospitalization, participants completed validated questionnaires assessing mother-infant bonding, risk for postpartum depression, and early postpartum anxiety symptoms. Outcomes were compared between women who underwent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia and those who received neuraxial anesthesia. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine whether anesthesia mode was independently associated with impaired bonding. Results A total of 366 women were included, of whom 96 underwent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia and 270 under neuraxial anesthesia. No significant between-group differences were found in mother-infant bonding outcomes. The impaired-bonding difference was borderline but not statistically significant. Risk for postpartum depression and early postpartum anxiety symptoms was low and comparable between groups. After adjustment for potential confounders, anesthesia mode was not independently associated with impaired mother-infant bonding. Conclusion In this cohort, anesthesia mode for cesarean delivery was not independently associated with impaired early mother-infant bonding. Risk for postpartum depression and early anxiety symptoms did not differ significantly between groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijoa.2026.105224

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Azbarga, A., Wainstock, T., Binyamin, Y., Sheiner, E., Reuveni, I., & Pariente, G.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Binyamin, Yair
Venue
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-11
Volume
68
Pages
105224
ISSN
0959-289X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7165782614
Cited by
1
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
cesarean section, mother-infant bonding, postpartum depression, postpartum anxiety, general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia, early postpartum period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review