Cited by 14Cancer survivorship and carePain Management and Placebo EffectMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Randomized controlled trial of an 8-week intervention combining self-care and hypnosis for post-treatment cancer patients: study protocol

Open access
Grégoire, Charlotte, Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth, Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey, Charland-Verville, Vanessa, Jerusalem, Guy, Bragard, Isabelle·2018·BMC Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer has a lot of consequences on patients' quality of life (such as cancer-related fatigue (CRF), sleep difficulties and emotional distress) and on patients' partners and their relationship, such as distress and communication difficulties. These consequences are undertreated, and interventions based on hypnosis often focus on breast cancer patients only. This paper describes the study protocol of a longitudinal randomized controlled trial aiming to assess the efficacy of an 8-week intervention combining hypnosis and self-care to improve cancer patients' CRF, sleep and emotional distress and to indirectly improve their partners' distress. METHODS: A power analysis required a total sample of 88 patients. To test the efficacy of the intervention, results of the experimental group receiving the intervention will be compared to those of the control group. Data will be collected by questionnaires, relaxation tasks, an attentional bias task, and everyday life assessments measured at four different times: 1.) before inclusion in the study (baseline); 2.) after the intervention; and 3.) at 4- and 12-month follow-up. Partners' symptoms will also be evaluated with questionnaires at the same measurement times. DISCUSSION: There is a growing interest in alternative approaches (such as hypnosis) in addition to standard therapies in oncology settings. The results of this study should be useful for improving knowledge about long-term efficacy of hypnosis-based group interventions for CRF, sleep and distress among all types of cancer patients and their partners, and to better understand the mechanisms of emotional regulation in cancer patients through the attentional bias task. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03144154). Retrospectively registered on the 1st of May, 2017.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12885-018-5046-6

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of the evidence supporting hypnosis derives from adjacent domains involving procedural distress, expectancy modulation, and stress regulation.

    “Most of the evidence supporting hypnosis derives from adjacent domains involving procedural distress, expectancy modulation, and stress regulation (15, 27, 36, 37).”

    From Mindfulness and clinical hypnotherapy in sexual desire disorders: mechanisms, psychophysiological pathways, and integrative therapeutic sequencing (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Background reports studies of hypnosis for cancer-related fatigue, sleep, and distress, and the Discussion describes possible effects on emotional regulation. Neither section establishes that most supporting evidence comes from adjacent domains involving procedural distress, expectancy modulation, and stress regulation; the paper instead says most of the studies it discusses focus on breast cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence from adjacent medical domains supports mechanistic plausibility regarding stress regulation and attentional modulation.

    “Evidence from adjacent medical domains supports mechanistic plausibility regarding stress regulation and attentional modulation (15, 19, 27, 34, 36, 37).”

    From Mindfulness and clinical hypnotherapy in sexual desire disorders: mechanisms, psychophysiological pathways, and integrative therapeutic sequencing (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes that hypnosis could influence cognition and emotional regulation and hypothesizes a link between reduced distress and attentional bias. The Methods and design > Assessments section describes measures of anxiety regulation and attentional bias. Because this is a study protocol, it offers a rationale for mechanistic plausibility, not results demonstrating stress regulation or attentional modulation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [68]Vanhaudenhuyse A Faymonville M-E Intérêt de l’hypnose dans le domaine du soin Rev Prat 2015 65 457 459 26058178

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grégoire, C., Faymonville, M.-E., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Charland-Verville, V., Jerusalem, G., & Bragard, I.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Grégoire, Charlotte
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2018-11-15
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
1113-1113
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901686673
Cited by
14
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fondation Roi Baudouin (2016-J5120580-205427)
  • Plan National Cancer of Belgium (138)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
hypnosis, self-care, cancer-related fatigue, sleep disorders, emotional distress, cancer patients, partners of cancer patients, attentional bias, emotion regulation, quality of life, long-term efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Belgium, Fatigue, Humans, Hypnosis, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Self Care, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Antineoplastic Protocols, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review