Cited by 52Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors: protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
van der Spek, Nadia, Vos, Joël, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F, Breitbart, William, Cuijpers, Pim, Knipscheer-Kuipers, Kitty, Willemsen, Vincent, Tollenaar, Rob AEM +2 more·2014·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meaning-focused coping may be at the core of adequate adjustment to life after cancer. Cancer survivors who experience their life as meaningful are better adjusted, have better quality of life and psychological functioning. Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy for Cancer Survivors (MCGP-CS) was designed to help patients to sustain or enhance a sense of meaning and purpose in their lives. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MCGP-CS. METHODS/DESIGN: Survivors diagnosed with cancer in the last 5 years and treated with curative intent, are recruited via several hospitals in the Netherlands. After screening, 168 survivors are randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: 1. Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP-CS) 2. Supportive group psychotherapy (SGP) 3. Care as usual (CAU). Baseline assessment takes place before randomisation, with follow up assessments post-intervention and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Primary outcome is meaning making (PMP, PTGI, SPWB). Secondary outcome measures address quality of life (EORTC-30), anxiety and depression (HADS), hopelessness (BHS), optimism (LOT-R), adjustment to cancer (MAC), and costs (TIC-P, EQ-5D, PRODISQ). DISCUSSION: Meaning-focused coping is key to adjustment to life after cancer, however, there is a lack of evidence based psychological interventions in this area. Many cancer survivors experience feelings of loneliness and alienation, and have a need for peer support, therefore a group method in particular, can be beneficial for sustaining or enhancing a sense of meaning. If this MCGP-CS is effective for cancer survivors, it can be implemented in the practice of psycho-oncology care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR3571.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-14-22

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early randomized controlled trials have shown that a meaning-centered therapy, delivered either in a group or individual format, can help raise meaning and purpose in life among people with cancer.

    “Additionally, early randomized controlled trials have shown that a meaning-centered therapy, delivered either in a group or individual format, can help raise meaning and purpose in life among people with cancer (32, 33).”

    From Purpose in life and use of preventive health care services (2014) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Background reports promising evaluation studies that improved patients’ sense of meaning and cites a pilot randomized trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for advanced cancer patients. But it describes that trial’s finding as a potential reduction in emotional and spiritual suffering, not specifically an increase in meaning or purpose. It does not report a randomized trial of the individual format; this paper is itself a protocol, not a completed trial. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An increasing number of randomized controlled trials show that purpose in life can be raised.

    “An increasing number of randomized controlled trials show that purpose in life can be raised.”

    From Purpose in life and use of preventive health care services (2014) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Background reports that several evaluations of interventions for cancer patients found improved sense of meaning after treatment. It does not say that an increasing number of randomized controlled trials showed gains in purpose in life: the pilot randomized trial it describes concerned emotional and spiritual suffering, and the paper is a protocol rather than a report of trial results. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Classen C Butler LD Koopman C Miller E DiMiceli S Giese-Davis J Fobair P Carlson RW Kraemer HC Spiegel D Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer Arch of Gen Psychiatry 2001 28 494 501 11343530
  2. Beck AT Weissman A Lester D Trexler L Measurement of pessismism- hopelessness scale Cons and Clin Psy 1974 42 861 865 4436473

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Spek, N., Vos, J., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Breitbart, W., Cuijpers, P., Knipscheer-Kuipers, K., Willemsen, V., Tollenaar, R. A., van Asperen, C. J., & Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
22-22
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973419281
Cited by
52
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
cancer survivors, meaning-focused coping, meaning-making, adjustment to cancer, quality of life, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, optimism, cost-effectiveness, psycho-oncology, peer support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Emotions, Humans, Neoplasms, Netherlands, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Research Design, Treatment Outcome, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review