Cited by 127Schizophrenia research and treatmentMedication Adherence and ComplianceBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Relationship of insight with medication adherence and the impact on outcomes in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: results from a 1-year European outpatient observational study

Open access
Novick, Diego, Montgomery, William, Treuer, Tamas, Aguado, Jaume, Kraemer, Susanne, Haro, Josep Maria·2015·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have impaired insight and low medication adherence. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to explore the relationship between insight and medication adherence. METHODS: We included 903 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who participated in an observational study conducted in Europe on the outcomes of patients treated with two oral formulations of olanzapine over a 1-year period. Evaluations included Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), insight (Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder, SUMD) medication adherence (Medication Adherence Rating Scale, MARS), and therapeutic alliance (Working Alliance Inventory, WAI). RESULTS: Medication adherence was higher in bipolar patients (mean MARS score (SD) 6.5 (2.8) versus 5.8 (2.7) in schizophrenia; p < 0.001). Patients with schizophrenia had lower insight (i.e., SUMD item 1, unawareness of mental disorder, mean (SD) of 2.5 (1.3) in schizophrenia versus 1.9 (1.2) in bipolar, p < 0.001). Better insight was associated with higher adherence (Spearman Correlation Coefficient, SCC, ranging from 0.39 to 0.49 for the three SUMD general items, p < 0.0001 in all cases). Higher insight was related to a stronger therapeutic alliance (SCC ranging from 0.38 to 0.48, p < 0.0001). A path analysis revealed a positive impact of insight on adherence and alliance and that stronger alliance was related to lower clinical severity (lower CGI score). CONCLUSION: Insight and adherence were found to be closely related. Insight impacts on the therapeutic alliance with mental health professionals. These factors are associated to treatment outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-015-0560-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]American Psychiatric A Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, 2nd ed Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 2 Suppl 1 56 15000267
  2. [20]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders text revision: DSM-IV-TR 2000 Washington American Psychiatric Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novick, D., Montgomery, W., Treuer, T., Aguado, J., Kraemer, S., & Haro, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Eli Lilly (Australia) (AU)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Eli Lilly (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Novick, Diego
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2015-08-05
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
189-189
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1807166034
Cited by
127
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
insight, medication adherence, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, olanzapine, therapeutic relationship, awareness of mental disorder, treatment outcomes, clinical severity, Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder, Working Alliance Inventory
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adult, Benzodiazepines, Bipolar Disorder, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Treatment Outcome, Comprehension, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review