Cited by 14Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The engagement of psychiatrists in the assessment of euthanasia requests from psychiatric patients in Belgium: a survey study

Open access
Verhofstadt, Monica, Audenaert, Kurt, Van den Broeck, Kris, Deliens, Luc, Mortier, Freddy, Titeca, Koen, Pardon, Koen, De Bacquer, Dirk +1 more·2020·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Since its legalisation in 2002, the number of times euthanasia has been carried out in response to requests from adults with psychiatric conditions (APC) has continued to increase. However, little is known about why and how psychiatrists become engaged in the assessment of such euthanasia requests. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted between November 2018 and April 2019 of 499 psychiatrists affiliated with the Flemish Psychiatry Association. Chi square/Fisher’s exact tests were performed to examine if, and to what extent, psychiatrists’ backgrounds relate to their concrete experiences. The answers to the open question regarding motives for (non-) engagement were thematically coded. Results: Two hundred one psychiatrists participated, a response rate of 40%. During their careers, 80% of those responding have been confronted with at least one euthanasia request from an APC patient and 73% have become involved in the assessment procedure. Their engagement was limited to the roles of: referring physician (in 44% of the psychiatrists), attending physician (30%), legally required ‘advising physician’ (22%), and physician participating in the actual administration of the lethal drugs (5%). Within the most recent 12 months of practice, 61% of the respondents have been actively engaged in a euthanasia assessment procedure and 9% have refused at least once to be actively engaged due to their own conscientious objections and/or the complexity of the assessment. The main motive for psychiatrists to engage in euthanasia is the patient’s fundamental right in Belgian law to ask for euthanasia and the psychiatrist’s duty to respect that. The perception that they were sufficiently competent to engage in a euthanasia procedure was greater in psychiatrists who have already had concrete experience in the procedure. Conclusions: Although the majority of psychiatrists have been confronted with euthanasia requests from their APC patients, their engagement is often limited to referring the request to a colleague physician for further assessment. More research is needed to identify the determinants of a psychiatrist’s engagement in euthanasia for their APC patients and to discover the consequences of their non-, or their restricted or full engagement, on both the psychotherapeutic relationship and the course of the euthanasia request.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-020-02792-w

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although about 80% of Belgian psychiatrists had to deal with at least one MAiD-NT request, only 5% were actually involved in the administration of lethal drugs or attended when another physician was performing the act for their own patient.

    “although about 80% psychiatrists in Belgium had to deal with at least one MAiD-NT request, only 5% were actually involved in the administration of lethal drugs or attended when another physician was performing the act for their own patient [50]”
  • A recent Belgian survey study found psychiatrists struggle with these practices due to difficulties reconciling euthanasia assessment with the patient-psychiatrist relationship.

    “A recent Belgian survey study gauging psychiatrists’ attitudes and experiences on this topic pointed out that psychiatrists struggle with these practices, due to the difficulties of reconciling euthanasia assessment with the patient-psychiatrist relationship.14,15”
  • These cases illustrate the complexity of the procedures and the likely lack of consensus between the physicians involved, primarily concerning the incurability of the condition and the lack of reasonable perspectives for improvement.

    “These cases again illustrate the complexity of the procedures and therefore the likely lack of consensus between the physicians involved,14,15 which, according to our study, primarily concerns the incurability of the condition and the lack of reasonable perspectives for improvement.”
  • Symptoms of psychiatric disorders tend to change over time, even leading in some cases to remission and clinical and/or social rehabilitation.

    “Symptoms of psychiatric disorders tend to change over time – even leading, in some cases, to remission and clinical and/or social rehabilitation”
  • The tendency of psychiatric symptoms to change over time underscores the challenge to operationalising the legal criterion of incurability in the field of psychiatry.

    “this underscores the challenge to operationalising this legal criterion in the field of psychiatry, as stated in previous studies.14,15”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Cheng M Doctors clash over euthanasia for mentally ill 2017 New York Associated Press
  2. [30]Verhofstadt M, Audenaert K, Van den Broeck, K, Deliens L., Mortier F., Titeca K, et al. Psychiatrists’ encounters with and engagement in the assessment of euthanasia requests from psychiatric patients in Flanders and Brussels (forthcoming). PMC7414658 32770966

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verhofstadt, M., Audenaert, K., Van den Broeck, K., Deliens, L., Mortier, F., Titeca, K., Pardon, K., De Bacquer, D., & Chambaere, K.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • AZ Groeninge (BE)
Corresponding author
Verhofstadt, Monica
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2020-08-08
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
400-400
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047795441
Cited by
14
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G017818N and 1162618N)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, psychiatric patients, euthanasia requests, Belgian euthanasia law, conscientious objection, physician competence, referring physicians, therapeutic relationship, legalization of euthanasia
MeSH terms
Adult, Belgium, Cross-Sectional Studies, Euthanasia, Humans, Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review