Cited by 178Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?

Open access
Bolt, Eva Elizabeth, Snijdewind, Marianne C, Willems, Dick L, van der Heide, Agnes, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D·2015·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

Background: Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) in patients with psychiatric disease, dementia or patients who are tired of living (without severe morbidity) is highly controversial. Although such cases can fall under the Dutch Euthanasia Act, Dutch physicians seem reluctant to perform EAS, and it is not clear whether or not physicians reject the possibility of EAS in these cases. Aim: To determine whether physicians can conceive of granting requests for EAS in patients with cancer, another physical disease, psychiatric disease, dementia or patients who are tired of living, and to evaluate whether physician characteristics are associated with conceivability. A cross-sectional study (survey) was conducted among 2269 Dutch general practitioners, elderly care physicians and clinical specialists. Results: The response rate was 64% (n=1456). Most physicians found it conceivable that they would grant a request for EAS in a patient with cancer or another physical disease (85% and 82%). Less than half of the physicians found this conceivable in patients with psychiatric disease (34%), early-stage dementia (40%), advanced dementia (29–33%) or tired of living (27%). General practitioners were most likely to find it conceivable that they would perform EAS. Conclusions: This study shows that a minority of Dutch physicians find it conceivable that they would grant a request for EAS from a patient with psychiatric disease, dementia or a patient who is tired of living. For physicians who find EAS inconceivable in these cases, legal arguments and personal moral objections both probably play a role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/medethics-2014-102150

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolt, E. E., Snijdewind, M. C., Willems, D. L., van der Heide, A., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Bolt, Eva Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
592-598
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2118166928
Cited by
178
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
27.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, mental illness, dementia, physician attitudes, conceivability, general practitioners, physician characteristics, moral objections
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Death, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Nursing Homes, Patients, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Physicians, Quality of Life, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review