The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Government interventions are critical to addressing the global tobacco epidemic, a major public health problem that continues to deepen. We systematically synthesize research evidence on the effectiveness of government tobacco control policies promoted by the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), supporting the implementation of this international treaty on the tenth anniversary of it entering into force. METHODS: An overview of systematic reviews was prepared through systematic searches of five electronic databases, published up to March 2014. Additional reviews were retrieved from monthly updates until August 2014, consultations with tobacco control experts and a targeted search for reviews on mass media interventions. Reviews were assessed according to predefined inclusion criteria, and ratings of methodological quality were either extracted from source databases or independently scored. RESULTS: Of 612 reviews retrieved, 45 reviews met the inclusion criteria and 14 more were identified from monthly updates, expert consultations and a targeted search, resulting in 59 included reviews summarizing over 1150 primary studies. The 38 strong and moderate quality reviews published since 2000 were prioritized in the qualitative synthesis. Protecting people from tobacco smoke was the most strongly supported government intervention, with smoke-free policies associated with decreased smoking behaviour, secondhand smoke exposure and adverse health outcomes. Raising taxes on tobacco products also consistently demonstrated reductions in smoking behaviour. Tobacco product packaging interventions and anti-tobacco mass media campaigns may decrease smoking behaviour, with the latter likely an important part of larger multicomponent programs. Financial interventions for smoking cessation are most effective when targeted at smokers to reduce the cost of cessation products, but incentivizing quitting may be effective as well. Although the findings for bans on tobacco advertising were inconclusive, other evidence suggests they remain an important intervention. CONCLUSION: When designing and implementing tobacco control programs, governments should prioritize smoking bans and price increases of tobacco products followed by other interventions. Additional studies are needed on the various factors that can influence a policy's effectiveness and feasibility such as cost, local context, political barriers and implementation strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012
Ng, M., Freeman, M. K., Fleming, T. D., Robinson, M., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Thomson, B., Wollum, A., Sanman, E., Wulf, S., Lopez, A. D., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284692 · Cited by 1,576
Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review
Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188 · Cited by 1,072
Mozaffarian, D., Afshin, A., Benowitz, N. L., Bittner, V., Daniels, S. R., Franch, H. A., Jacobs, D. R., Kraus, W. E., Kris-Etherton, P. M., Krummel, D. A., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318260a20b · Cited by 601
Giles, E. L., Robalino, S., McColl, E., Sniehotta, F. F., & Adams, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090347 · Cited by 470
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Cahill, K., & Lancaster, T. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003440.pub4 · Cited by 421 · cited 2×
“[31] and Cahill and Lancaster [32] found that smokers offered incentives were 2.”
BackgroundInfluentialA systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up
Wiehe, S. E., Garrison, M. M., Christakis, D. A., Ebel, B. E., & Rivara, F. P. (2005) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.12.003 · Cited by 286
Smokefree Policies to Reduce Tobacco Use
Hopkins, D. P., Razi, S., Leeks, K. D., Priya Kalra, G., Chattopadhyay, S. K., & Soler, R. E. (2010) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.029 · Cited by 242
Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews
Lemmens, V., Oenema, A., Knut, I. K., & Brug, J. (2008) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e3282f75e48 · Cited by 220 · cited 1×
“The 22 reviews excluded after full-text screening either evaluated excluded outcome measures (n = 1) [73], were overviews of systematic reviews (n = 3) [74–76], did not follow a systematic methodology (n = 1) [77], only reported results of multicomponent programs (n = 4) [78–81], did not adequately describe what inter…”
BackgroundYouth Access Interventions Do Not Affect Youth Smoking
Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.109.6.1088 · Cited by 169
Interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors
Stead, L. F., & Lancaster, T. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001497.pub2 · Cited by 150
Cited by
European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019
Timmis, A., Townsend, N., Gale, C. P., Torbica, A., Lettino, M., Petersen, S. E., Mossialos, E. A., Maggioni, A. P., Kazakiewicz, D., May, H. T., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz859 · Cited by 1,017
Reis, R. S., Salvo, D., Ogilvie, D., Lambert, E. V., Goenka, S., & Brownson, R. C. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30728-0 · Cited by 719
Tobacco smoking: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions
West, R. (2017) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2017.1325890 · Cited by 694
Hone, T., Macinko, J., & Millett, C. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31829-4 · Cited by 330
Le Foll, B., Piper, M. E., Fowler, C. D., Tonstad, S., Bierut, L., Lu, L., Jha, P., & Hall, W. D. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00346-w · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, S. J., & Tan, C.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2015-08-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 744-744
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1944471557
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12889-015-2041-6
- The paper
- Hoffman, S. J., & Tan, C. (2015). Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2041-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.