Cited by 209Healthcare Systems and ReformsPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socio-economic inequalities in the multiple dimensions of access to healthcare: the case of South Africa

Open access

Abstract

Background: The National Development Plan (NDP) strives that South Africa, by 2030, in pursuit of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) achieve a significant shift in the equity of health services provision. This paper provides a diagnosis of the extent of socio-economic inequalities in health and healthcare using an integrated conceptual framework. Method: The 2012 South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1), a nationally representative study, collected data on a variety of questions related to health and healthcare. A range of concentration indices were calculated for health and healthcare outcomes that fit the various dimensions on the pathway of access. A decomposition analysis was employed to determine how downstream need and access barriers contribute to upstream inequality in healthcare utilisation. Results: In terms of healthcare need, good and ill health are concentrated among the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged, respectively. The relatively wealthy perceived a greater desire for care than the relatively poor. However, postponement of care seeking and unmet need is concentrated among the socio-economically disadvantaged, as are difficulties with the affordability of healthcare. The socio-economic divide in the utilisation of public and private healthcare services remains stark. Those who are economically disadvantaged are less satisfied with healthcare services. Affordability and ability to pay are the main drivers of inequalities in healthcare utilisation. Conclusion: In the South African health system, the socio-economically disadvantaged are discriminated against across the continuum of access. NHI offers a means to enhance ability to pay and to address affordability, while disparities between actual and perceived need warrants investment in health literacy outreach programmes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-020-8368-7

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Dimensions of access to healthcare: a conceptual framework
Fig. 1 Dimensions of access to healthcare: a conceptual frameworkCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Most common reasons for households postponing healthcare
Fig. 2 Most common reasons for households postponing healthcareCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Competition Commission. Health market inquiry. Provisional findings and recommendations report 2018.
  2. Shisana O, Labadarios D, Rehle T, Simbayi L, Zuma K, Dhansay A, et al. The South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey SANHANES-1. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37:45–60.
  3. Hunter JR, Asmall S, Ravhengani NM, Chandran TM, Tucker J, Mokgalagadi Y. The ideal Clinic in South Africa: progress and challenges in implementation. South African Heal Rev. 2015/16;2016:111–24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–209 of 209

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, T., Booysen, F., & Mbonigaba, J.
Affiliations
  • Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Tanja
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
289-289
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012082939
Cited by
209
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 3
FWCI
19.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Department for International Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
socioeconomic inequalities in health, health care access, universal health coverage, health care utilization, health care affordability, health care satisfaction, national health insurance, health literacy, decomposition analysis, concentration index, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Socioeconomic Factors, South Africa, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review