Cited by 25Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Positive recovery for low-risk injuries screened by the short form - orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire following road traffic injury: evidence from an inception cohort study in New South Wales, Australia

Open access
Nguyen, Ha, Rebbeck, Trudy, Kifley, Annette, Jagnoor, Jagnoor, Dinh, Michael, Shetty, Amith, Nicholas, Michael, Cameron, Ian D.·2019·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of musculoskeletal disorders following injury is essential in determining appropriate treatment and care. A generic validated prognostic tool to stratify risk of poor recovery for people with musculoskeletal injuries after road traffic crash is not available. This study aimed to examine differences in recovery, return to work and health related quality of life between low and high-risk of poor recovery people with musculoskeletal injuries stratified by the Short form - Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (SF-OMPSQ). METHODS: In an inception cohort study, participants with non-fracture musculoskeletal injury with the main site being the neck, lower back or lower limb were stratified into low (score ≤ 50) and high (score > 50) risk of poor recovery using the SF-OMPSQ score at baseline. We assessed the proportion of fully recovered participants (Global Perceived Effect scale ≥4), the proportion returning to work and changes in short form 12-item (SF-12) scores between baseline and 6-month follow-up in low and high-risk groups. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk ratio (RR) of being recovered and return to work in the low and high-risk groups. Paired t-test was used to compare changes in SF-12 physical and mental component summary scales, and chi-square test was used to assess the significance of the risk ratio of fully recovered between low and high-risk groups. RESULTS: The study included 498 participants (166 with neck, 78 with lower back and 254 with lower limb injuries). The proportion of being recovered was significantly higher in the low than the high-risk groups (Adjusted risk ratio: 2.96 [95% CI: 1.81 to 4.82]). Significantly more people in the low-risk group returned to work (91.0%) than the high-risk group (54.6%). People at low-risk had higher SF-12 scores at baseline and 6-month follow-up than those at high-risk. There were no differences between injury types for recovery and return to work at 6 months. CONCLUSION: The SF-OMPSQ could be recommended as a generic prognostic tool to identify individuals with musculoskeletal injuries early after road traffic injury, who would have a higher or lower likelihood of recovering or returning fully to pre-injury work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical trial registry identification number - ACTRN12613000889752. Registered 09 August 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12891-019-2881-9

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]World Health Organisation. Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: WHO press; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, H., Rebbeck, T., Kifley, A., Jagnoor, J., Dinh, M., Shetty, A., Nicholas, M., & Cameron, I. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Ha
Venue
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
531-531
ISSN
1471-2474 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984321146
Cited by
25
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
State Insurance Regulatory Authority of New South Wales, Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
musculoskeletal injuries, road traffic injuries, recovery, return to work, health-related quality of life, cervical spine injury, low back injury, lower limb injuries, injury prognosis, SF-12, New South Wales, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Low Back Pain, Risk Assessment, Neck Pain, Recovery of Function, Young Adult, Musculoskeletal Pain, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review