Cited by 21Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsStudent Assessment and Feedback

Impact of video feedback system on medical students’ perception of their clinical performance assessment

Open access
Kam, Bee Sung, Yune, So Jung, Lee, Sang Yeoup, Im, Sun Ju, Baek, Sun Yong·2019·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providing feedback on student performance in the clinical performance assessment (CPA) is meaningful in that it helps students understand their strengths and weaknesses. This study compared students' perception of their CPA scores before and after providing personalized video feedback. METHODS: Two identical online surveys of Year 1 medical students (N = 103) that had undergone CPA were conducted to evaluate students' perceptions about their CPA scores before and after video feedback. Students were given their test scores with assessment analysis reports immediately after completing the CPA. Top-scored students from each station agreed to provide their video-recorded performance to the rest of the students. RESULTS: After comparing their performance video and top-scored video at each station, medical students were more aware of their CPA total score, clinical performance examination (CPX) total score, score of each CPX station, section score for the CPX station, history taking section score, physical examination section score, and doctor-patient relationship section score. Moreover, students became more convinced of their own weaknesses from their history taking and patient education section after viewing video feedback than before. CONCLUSION: The use of the video feedback system might help students recognize their CPA results and identify their strengths and weaknesses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-019-1688-6

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Harrison CJ Molyneux SB Blackwell S Wass VJ How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs Med Teach 2015 37 4 323 326 10.3109/0142159X.2014.932901 24989869 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kam, B. S., Yune, S. J., Lee, S. Y., Im, S. J., & Baek, S. Y.
Affiliations
  • Pusan National University (KR)
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Sang Yeoup
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2019-07-08
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
252-252
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955173725
Cited by
21
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
This study was supported by a Biomedical Research Institute Grant from Pusan National University Hospital (2016-15)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
video feedback, clinical performance assessment, medical students, student perceptions, self-assessment, clinical skills assessment, medical history, physical examination, physician-patient relationship, personalized feedback
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Humans, Self-Assessment, Students, Medical, Video Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review