Cited by 74Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Is video review of patient encounters an effective tool for medical student learning? A review of the literature

Open access
Hammoud, Maya, Morgan, Edwards, Lyon, White·2012·Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if video review of student performance during patient encounters is an effective tool for medical student learning. METHODS: MULTIPLE BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASES THAT INCLUDE MEDICAL, GENERAL HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY, AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE LITERATURE WERE SEARCHED FOR THE FOLLOWING TERMS: medical students, medical education, undergraduate medical education, education, self-assessment, self-evaluation, self-appraisal, feedback, videotape, video recording, televised, and DVD. The authors examined all abstracts resulting from this search and reviewed the full text of the relevant articles as well as additional articles identified in the reference lists of the relevant articles. Studies were classified by year of student (preclinical or clinical) and study design (controlled or non-controlled). RESULTS: A total of 67 articles met the final search criteria and were fully reviewed. Most studies were non-controlled and performed in the clinical years. Although the studies were quite variable in quality, design, and outcomes, in general video recording of performance and subsequent review by students with expert feedback had positive outcomes in improving feedback and ultimate performance. Video review with self-assessment alone was not found to be generally effective, but when linked with expert feedback it was superior to traditional feedback alone. CONCLUSION: There are many methods for integrating effective use of video-captured performance into a program of learning. We recommend combining student self-assessment with feedback from faculty or other trained individuals for maximum effectiveness. We also recommend additional research in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/amep.s20219

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammoud, M., Morgan, Edwards, Lyon, & White
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Hammoud, Maya
Venue
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Published
2012-03
Volume
3
Pages
19
ISSN
1179-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098883653
Cited by
74
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Medical Education and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
video review, patient encounters, medical student learning, self-assessment, expert feedback, clinical skills assessment, undergraduate medical education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review