Cited by 291Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Practises and Engagement

Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning?

Beaumont, Chris, O’Doherty, Michelle, Shannon, Lee·2011·Studies in Higher Education

Abstract

This article reports the findings of research into the student experience of assessment in school/college and higher education, and the impact of transition upon student perceptions of feedback quality. It involved a qualitative study of 23 staff and 145 students in six schools/colleges and three English universities across three disciplines. Results show that students experience a radically different culture of feedback in schools/colleges and higher education, with the former providing extensive formative feedback and guidance, while the latter focuses upon independent learning judged summatively. Students perceived quality feedback as part of a dialogic guidance process rather than a summative event. A model is proposed, the Dialogic Feedback Cycle, to describe student experiences at school/college, and suggestions are made as to how it can be used as a tool to scaffold the development of independent learning throughout the first year of university study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03075071003731135

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L.
Affiliations
  • Edge Hill University (GB)
  • Liverpool Hope University (GB)
Corresponding author
Beaumont, Chris
Venue
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2011-09
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
671-687
ISSN
  • 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-174X
OpenAlex
W2010319006
Cited by
291
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
56.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
assessment feedback, feedback quality, student experience, transition to higher education, formative feedback, summative assessment, dialogic feedback, self-directed learning, first-year students, school-to-university transition, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review