Cited by 17Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutInnovations in Medical EducationStress and Burnout Research

Graduate medical education-led continuous assessment of burnout and learning environments to improve residents’ wellbeing

Open access
Ogunyemi, Dotun, Darwish, Ali Ghassan, Young, Gregory, Cyr, Erica, Lee, Carol, Arabian, Sarkis, Challakere, Kedar, Lee, Tommy +2 more·2022·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Promoting residents’ wellbeing and decreasing burnout is a focus of Graduate Medical Education (GME). A supportive clinical learning environment is required to optimize residents’ wellness and learning. Objective: To determine if longitudinal assessments of burnout and learning environment as perceived by residents combined with applying continuous quality Model for Improvement and serial Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles to test interventions would improve residents’ burnout. Methods: From November 2017 to January 2020, 271 GME residents in internal medicine, general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology, were assessed over five cycles by Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and by clinical learning environment factors (which included personal/social relationships, self-defined burnout, program burnout support, program back-up support, clinical supervision by faculty, and sleep difficulties). The results of the MBI and clinical learning environment factors were observed and analyzed to determine and develop indicated Institutional and individual program interventions using a Plan, Do, Study, Act process with each of the five cycles. Results: The response rate was 78.34%. MBI parameters for all GME residents improved over time but were not statistically significant. Residents’ positive perception of the clinical supervision by faculty was significantly and independently associated with improved MBI scores, while residents’ self-defined burnout; and impaired personal relations perceptions were independently significantly associated with adverse MBI scores on liner regression. For all GME, significant improvements improved over time in residents’ perception of impaired personal relationships (p < 0.001), self-defined burnout (p = 0.013), program burn-out support (p = 0.002) and program back-up support (p = 0.028). For the Internal Medicine Residency program, there were statistically significant improvements in all three MBI factors (p < 0.001) and in clinical learning environment measures (p = 0.006 to < 0.001). Interventions introduced during the PDSA cycles included organization-directed interventions (such as: faculty and administrative leadership recruitment, workflow interventions and residents’ schedule optimization), and individual interventions (such as: selfcare, mentoring and resilience training). Conclusion: In our study, for all GME residents, clinical learning environment factors in contrast to MBI factors showed significant improvements. Residents’ positive perception of the clinical learning environment was associated with improved burnout measures. Residents in separate programs responded differently with one program reaching significance in all MBI and clinical learning environment factors measured. Continuous wellbeing assessment of all GME residents and introduction of Institutional and individual program interventions was accomplished.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-022-03366-y

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outcome measurements were conducted using various versions of the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): 26 studies used the 22-item MBI, 5 used the 9-item MBI, 1 used the 20-item Dutch version, and 1 used the 16-item MBI.

    “Outcome measurements were conducted using various versions of the validated MBI. Specifically, 26 studies (78.7%) used the 22-item MBI [44, 45, 47–49, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60–65, 67, 68, 70–76], 5 studies (15.2%) employed the 9-item MBI [50, 53, 55, 59, 69], 1 study (3.0%) used the 20-item Dutch version of the MBI [57], and 1 study (3.0%) utilized the 16-item MBI [66].”

    From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The citation to this paper is attached specifically to the statement that one study used a 16-item MBI. The paper’s Discussion says it used the 22-item MBI, and its Methods list subscales of 9, 5, and 8 items, totaling 22. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the improved learning environment subgroup, EE and DP were not significantly changed, but PA was significantly improved: EE -0.20 (95% CI -0.61 to 0.21, p = 0.74, I2 = 54.8%), DP -0.07 (95% CI -0.58 to 0.44, p = 0.79, I2 = 69.6%), PA 0.28 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.50, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%).

    “Moreover, the subgroup of improved learning environment interventions [48, 49] showed non-statistically significant post-intervention mean score differences in EE (-0.20, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.21, p = 0.74, I2 = 54.8%) and DP (-0.07, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.44, p = 0.79, I2 = 69.6%), but a significant difference in PA (0.28, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.50, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%).”

    From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 using historical controls, 13 utilizing self-control studies, and 11 randomized controlled concurrent trials.

    “The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 (27.2%) using historical controls [44, 48, 49, 56, 59, 68, 71, 75, 76] and 13 (39.4%) utilizing self-control studies [47, 50, 53, 54, 58, 61, 65–67, 69, 70, 72, 73]. Eleven (33.3%) studies were randomized, controlled, concurrent trials [45, 51, 52, 55, 57, 60–64, 74].”

    From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Discussion (Limitations; page unavailable) describes this paper as an observational study without control groups, supporting its identification as a non-randomized study. The paper does not report the citing sentence’s totals of 9 historical-control studies, 13 self-control studies, or 11 randomized trials, and our copy does not establish which category the citing authors assigned it to. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Organizational interventions showed no statistically significant association with any burnout domain (EE, DP, PA).

    “In organizational intervention studies [44, 45, 47–49, 73, 76], pooling of post-intervention intervention Cohen’s d SMD yielded non-statistically significant resulted in all outcomes, EE (-0.22, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.04, p = 0.10, I2 = 62.6%) (Fig. 3A), DP (-0.15, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.08, p = 0.21, I2 = 53.0%) (Fig. 3B), and PA (0.12, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.25, p = 0.07; I2 = 0%) (Fig. 3C).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogunyemi, D., Darwish, A. G., Young, G., Cyr, E., Lee, C., Arabian, S., Challakere, K., Lee, T., Wong, S., & Raval, N.
Affiliations
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ogunyemi, Dotun
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2022-04-18
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
292-292
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224237084
Cited by
17
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
burnout, graduate medical education, clinical learning environment, clinical supervision, faculty supervision, sleep disorders, interpersonal relationships, PDSA cycle, continuous quality improvement, Maslach Burnout Inventory, resilience training, mentoring, self-care, internal medicine residency, general surgery residency, psychiatry residency, emergency medicine residency
MeSH terms
Burnout, Psychological, Burnout, Professional, Education, Medical, Graduate, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Internship and Residency, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review