Cited by 77Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyTechnology Use by Older Adults

Exploring factors associated with the uneven utilization of telemedicine in Norway: a mixed methods study

Open access
Alami, H., Gagnon, M. P., Wootton, R., Fortin, J. P., Zanaboni, P.·2017·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Norway has a long history of using telemedicine, especially for geographical reasons. Despite the availability of promising telemedicine applications and the implementation of national initiatives and policies, the sustainability and scaling-up of telemedicine in the health system is still far from accomplished. The main objective of this study was to explore and identify the multi-level (micro, meso and macro) factors affecting telemedicine utilization in Norway. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach. Data from a national registry were collected to analyze the use of outpatient visits and telemedicine contacts in Norway from 2009 to 2015. Interviews with key stakeholders at national, regional and local level helped complete and contextualize the data analysis and explore the main issues affecting the use of telemedicine by health authorities and hospitals. Relevant national documents were also used to support, contradict, contextualize or clarify information and data. RESULTS: Telemedicine use in Norway from 2009 to 2015 remained very low, not exceeding 0.5% of total outpatient activity at regional level and 0.1% at national level. All four regions used telemedicine. Of the 29 hospitals, 24 used it at least once over the 7-year period. Telemedicine was not used regularly everywhere, with some hospitals using it sporadically. Telemedicine was mostly used in selected specialties, including rehabilitation, neurosurgery, skin and venereal diseases. Three major themes affecting implementation and utilization of telemedicine in Norway emerged: (i) governance and strategy; (ii) organizational and professional dimensions; (iii) economic and financial dimensions. For each theme, a number of factors and challenges faced at different health care levels were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed shedding light on multi-level and interdependent factors affecting utilization of telemedicine in Norway. The identification of the main implementation and utilization challenges might support decision makers and practitioners in the successful scaling-up of telemedicine. This work provides a knowledge base useful to other countries which intend to implement telemedicine or other digital health services into their healthcare systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12911-017-0576-4

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Neby S. Institutional reform and governance in the Scandinavian hospital fields. The dynamics of and between change and control: PhD dissertation, Department of Administration and Organization Theory. Bergen: University of Bergen; 2009.
  2. [20]Hartvigsen G. Ten lessons for successful implementation of telemedicine Services in North Norway. Scandinavian conference on health informatics 2013; Copenhagen; Denmark; August 20; 2013: Linköping University Electronic Press.
  3. [49]Cassiman S. Le Management de Transition vers la Soutenabilité. Ed Wolters Kluwer Belgium. 2011.
  4. [76]Fortin JP, Gagnon MP, Lamothe L. Evaluation of health care information and communication technologies: a framework to support decision making. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Society; Avila, July 18–21,2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alami, H., Gagnon, M. P., Wootton, R., Fortin, J. P., & Zanaboni, P.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise (CA)
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Zanaboni, P.
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2017-12
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
180-180
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2778428211
Cited by
77
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Center on Healthcare and Services in Primary Care of Laval University (CERSSPL-UL)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
telehealth utilization, telehealth implementation, multilevel determinants, digital health services, health care governance, outpatient visits
MeSH terms
Hospitals, Humans, Norway, Registries, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review