The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of telehealth in monitoring HbA1c levels in people living with type 2 diabetes. However, the overall magnitude of effect is yet unclear due to variable results reported in existing systematic reviews. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials to create an evidence-base for the effectiveness of telehealth interventions on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Electronic databases including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC, and PsychINFO were searched to identify relevant systematic reviews published between 1990 and April 2016, supplemented by references search from the relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers selected and reviewed the eligible studies. Of the 3279 references retrieved, 4 systematic reviews reporting in total 29 unique studies relevant to our review were included. Both conventional pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Evidence from pooling four systematic reviews found that telehealth interventions produced a small but significant improvement in HbA1c levels compared with usual care (MD: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.73 to - 0.36). The greatest effect was seen in telephone-delivered interventions, followed by Internet blood glucose monitoring system interventions and lastly interventions involving automatic transmission of SMBG using a mobile phone or a telehealth unit. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that telehealth is effective in controlling HbA1c levels in people living with type 2 diabetes. However there is need for better quality primary studies as well as systematic reviews of RCTs in order to confidently conclude on the impact of telehealth on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with previous research on telehealth remote monitoring using Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) transmission devices [52, 53].”
From Effect of virtual care in type 2 diabetes management – a systematic umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions
Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., & Clarke, M. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-15 · Cited by 1,227
Hex, N., Bartlett, C., Wright, D., Taylor, M., & Varley, D. (2012) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x · Cited by 819
Network meta‐analysis, electrical networks and graph theory
Rücker, G. (2012) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1058 · Cited by 730
A brief history of research synthesis
Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278702025001003 · Cited by 552
Liang, X., Wang, Q., Yang, X., Cao, J., Chen, J., Mo, X., Huang, J., Wang, L., & Gu, D. (2011) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x · Cited by 515
Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: A simulation study
Reichmann, W. M., GAGNON, D. R., Horsburgh, C. R., & Losina, E. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-1 · Cited by 310
Zhai, Y.-K., Zhu, W.-J., Cai, Y.-L., Sun, D.-X., & Zhao, J. (2014) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000000312 · Cited by 221
Ramadas, A., Quek, K. F., Chan, C. K. Y., & Oldenburg, B. (2011) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.002 · Cited by 180
Baron, J., McBain, H., & Newman, S. (2012) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681200600524 · Cited by 123
Greenwood, D. A., Young, H. M., & Quinn, C. C. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296813519311 · Cited by 96
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Starr, M., Chalmers, I., Clarke, M. J., & Oxman, A. D. (2009) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s026646230909062x · Cited by 93
Health Technologies for Monitoring and Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Review
Russell-Minda, E., Jutai, J., Speechley, M., Bradley, K., Chudyk, A., & Petrella, R. (2009) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229680900300628 · Cited by 92
Huang, Z., Tao, H., Meng, Q., & Jing, L. (2015) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-14-0441 · Cited by 81
Diabetes Management Using Modern Information and Communication Technologies and New Care Models
Spanakis, E. G., Chiarugi, F., Kouroubali, A., Spat, S., Beck, P., Asanin, S., Rosengren, P., Gergely, T., & Thestrup, J. (2012) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.2193 · Cited by 52
The Karlsburg Diabetes Management System: Translation from Research to eHealth Application
Salzsieder, E., & Augstein, P. (2011) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681100500103 · Cited by 30
Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Provide Lasting Glycemic Benefit in Type 1 and 2 Diabetes
Tildesley, H. D., Po, M. D., & Ross, S. A. (2014) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.08.019 · Cited by 17
Steventon, A., Billings, J., Dixon, J., & Bardsley, M. (2012) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.955 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Mogensen CE, Zimmet PZ, Matthews DR, Kingdom U, Ceriello A, Cerasi E, et al. 25 years of progress in type 2 diabetes. Medicographia. 2011;33(1):106.
- Corbett-Nolan A, Bullivant JD, Green M, Parker M. Better care for people with long-term conditions : the quality and good governance of telehealth services. Good Governance UK GGI limited.; 2011. p. 1–40.
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tool. AMSTAR: assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2011.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A framework for digital health equity
Richardson, S., Lawrence, K., Schoenthaler, A. M., & Mann, D. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00663-0 · Cited by 607
Shaw, S. E., Seuren, L. M., Wherton, J. P., Cameron, D., A’Court, C., Vijayaraghavan, S., Morris, J. H., Bhattacharya, S., & Greenhalgh, T. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18378 · Cited by 173
Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hospital Discharged COVID-19 Patients
Gordon, W. J., Henderson, D., DeSharone, A., Fisher, H. N., Judge, J., Levine, D. M., MacLean, L., Sousa, D., Su, M. Y., & Boxer, R. (2020) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0040-1721039 · Cited by 127
Marthick, M., McGregor, D., Alison, J. A., Cheema, B. S., Dhillon, H. M., & Shaw, T. J. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24722 · Cited by 124
Telemedicine-Assisted Self-Management Program for Type 2 Diabetes Patients
von Storch, K., Graaf, E. T.-D., Wunderlich, M., Rietz, C., Polidori, M. C., & Woopen, C. (2019) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0056 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, P. A., Greenfield, G., & Pappas, Y.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Bedfordshire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Puikwan A.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2018-06-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 495-495
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6019730
- OpenAlex
- W2810382483
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, telephone-delivered intervention, self-monitoring of blood glucose
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Evidence-Based Medicine, Internet, Qualitative Research, Cell Phone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
