Cited by 127Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Hospital Discharged COVID-19 Patients

Open access
Gordon, William J., Henderson, Daniel, DeSharone, Avital, Fisher, Herrick N., Judge, Jessica, Levine, David M., MacLean, Laura, Sousa, Diane +2 more·2020·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

Objective We deployed a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) program to monitor patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon hospital discharge. We describe the patient characteristics, program characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients in our RPM program. Methods We enrolled COVID-19 patients being discharged home from the hospital. Enrolled patients had an app, and were provided with a pulse oximeter and thermometer. Patients self-reported symptoms, O2 saturation, and temperature daily. Abnormal symptoms or vital signs were flagged and assessed by a pool of nurses. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient and program characteristics. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the odds of a combined endpoint of emergency department (ED) or hospital readmission. Results A total of 295 patients were referred for RPM from five participating hospitals, and 225 patients were enrolled. A majority of enrolled patients (66%) completed the monitoring period without triggering an abnormal alert. Enrollment was associated with a decreased odds of ED or hospital readmission (adjusted odds ratio: 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.3–0.97; p = 0.039). Referral without enrollment was not associated with a reduced odds of ED or hospital readmission. Conclusion RPM for COVID-19 provides a mechanism to monitor patients in their home environment and reduce hospital utilization. Our work suggests that RPM reduces readmissions for patients with COVID-19 and provides scalable remote monitoring capabilities upon hospital discharge. RPM for postdischarge patients with COVID-19 was associated with a decreased risk of readmission to the ED or hospital, and provided a scalable mechanism to monitor patients in their home environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0040-1721039

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown that RPM reduces hospital readmissions among patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

    “and reduces hospital readmissions among patients hospitalized for COVID-19.5”

    From Challenges and Facilitators in Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring Programs in Primary Care (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract reports that RPM enrollment was associated with lower odds of a combined endpoint of emergency-department or hospital readmission (adjusted odds ratio 0.54). The claim states that RPM reduces hospital readmissions specifically, but the paper reports an association for a combined endpoint, not a separate hospital-readmission effect or a demonstrated causal reduction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gordon, W. J., Henderson, D., DeSharone, A., Fisher, H. N., Judge, J., Levine, D. M., MacLean, L., Sousa, D., Su, M. Y., & Boxer, R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Gordon, William J.
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2020-10
Volume
11
Issue
05
Pages
792-801
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108004137
Cited by
127
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 25
FWCI
17.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, COVID-19 pandemic, hospital discharge, hospital readmission, emergency department readmission, pulse oximetry, self-reported symptoms, mobile health apps, nurse triage, post-discharge monitoring, hospital utilization
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Aftercare, Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review