Cited by 180Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Web-based interventions for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of recent evidence

Ramadas, A., Quek, K.F., Chan, C.K.Y., Oldenburg, B.·2011·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Introduction The Internet has emerged as a potentially effective medium for information exchange. The Internet's potential has been recognised and web-based education programmes have been steadily adopted in recent years in preventing and managing chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. This review provides a descriptive discussion of web-based behavioural interventions for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Method Systematic literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library to retrieve articles published between 2000 and June 2010 which fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Methodological quality assessment and data synthesis were then performed. Results Twenty articles representing 13 different studies were reviewed. None of the studies were ranked as low in the methodological quality. Goal-setting, personalised coaching, interactive feedback and online peer support groups were some of the successful approaches which were applied in e-interventions to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus. Strong theoretical background, use of other technologies and longer duration of intervention were proven to be successful strategies as well. Conclusion The web-based interventions have demonstrated some level of favourable outcomes, provided they are further enhanced with proper e-research strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramadas, A., Quek, K. F., Chan, C. K. Y., & Oldenburg, B.
Affiliations
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ramadas, A.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
80
Issue
6
Pages
389-405
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119714597
Cited by
180
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, online intervention, e-health, behavioral interventions, goal setting, interactive feedback, online peer support, chronic disease management, internet-based education
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review