Cited by 87Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchDigital Mental Health Interventions

Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their health care providers towards using mHealth for self-management of exacerbations: a qualitative study

Open access
Korpershoek, Y. J. G., Vervoort, S. C. J. M., Trappenburg, J. C. A., Schuurmans, M. J.·2018·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-management of exacerbations in COPD patients is important to reduce exacerbation impact. There is a need for more comprehensive and individualized interventions to improve exacerbation-related self-management behavior. The use of mobile health (mHealth) could help to achieve a wide variety of behavioral goals. Understanding of patients and health care providers perspectives towards using mHealth in promoting self-management will greatly enhance the development of solutions with optimal usability and feasibility. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore perceptions of COPD patients and their health care providers towards using mHealth for self-management of exacerbations. METHODS: A qualitative study using focus group interviews with COPD patients (n = 13) and health care providers (HCPs) (n = 6) was performed to explore perceptions towards using mHealth to support exacerbation-related self-management. Data were analyzed by a thematic analysis. RESULTS: COPD patients and HCPs perceived mostly similar benefits and barriers of using mHealth for exacerbation-related self-management. These perceived benefits and barriers seem to be important drivers in the willingness to use mHealth. Both patients and HCPs strengthen the need for a multi-component and tailored mHealth intervention that improves patients' exacerbation-related self-management by determining their health status and providing adequate information, decision support and feedback on self-management behavior. Most importantly, patients and HCPs considered an mHealth intervention as support to improve self-management and emphasized that it should never replace patients' own feelings nor undermine their own decisions. In addition, the intervention should be complementary to regular contact with HCPs, as personal contact with a HCP was considered to be very important. To optimize engagement with mHealth, patients should have a positive attitude toward using mHealth and an mHealth intervention should be attractive, rewarding and safe. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insight into perceptions of COPD patients and their HCPs towards using mHealth for self-management of exacerbations. This study points out that future mHealth interventions should focus on developing self-management skills over time by providing adequate information, decision support and feedback on self-management behavior and that mHealth should complement regular care. To optimize engagement, mHealth interventions should be attractive, rewarding, safe and tailored to the patient needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-018-3545-4

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits of remote patient monitoring between clinic visits in detecting health deterioration earlier and enabling prompt intervention, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions.

    “Numerous studies have highlighted the benefits of remote patient monitoring between clinic visits in detecting health deterioration earlier and enabling prompt intervention, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions [44–50].”

    From Caregiver experiences of an integrative patient-centered digital health application for pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Findings from a pilot clinical trial (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results describe earlier recognition of COPD exacerbations as a potential benefit of mHealth symptom monitoring, and the Discussion says participants thought mHealth could encourage prompt health care contact. This qualitative study does not establish that remote patient monitoring achieves earlier detection or prompt intervention across chronic conditions; it also reports clinicians’ concerns about missing signals when monitoring patients at home. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies on remote patient monitoring confirm the importance of HCP involvement with digital tools.

    “Studies on remote patient monitoring confirm the importance of HCP involvement with digital tools [44–48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare: 3rd ed: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korpershoek, Y. J. G., Vervoort, S. C. J. M., Trappenburg, J. C. A., & Schuurmans, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Korpershoek, Y. J. G.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2018-10-04
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
757-757
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895582407
Cited by
87
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD exacerbations, self-management, mobile health, patient perspectives, healthcare provider perceptions, decision support, patient engagement, personalized interventions
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Facilities and Services Utilization, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Personnel, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Self Care, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review