Cited by 42Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorMobile Learning in Education

The effectiveness of mobile application for monitoring diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the adult and elderly population: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
de Souza Ferreira, Emily, de Aguiar Franco, Fernanda, dos Santos Lara, Marina Marilac, Levcovitz, André Amaral, Dias, Mateus Araújo, Moreira, Tiago Ricardo, de Oliveira, Ary Henrique Morais, Cotta, Rosângela Minardi Mitre·2023·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Context: Arterial Hypertension (AH) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) are diseases that are getting worse all over the world. Linked to this advance, is the growing digital health market with numerous mobile health applications, which aim to help patients and professionals in the proper management of chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to analyze, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of using mobile health applications in monitoring AH and/or DM in the adult and elderly population. Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses guidelines and involved searching five databases – Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Virtual Library in Health and Cochrane Library. The review included randomized and cohort clinical trials testing the effects of the intervention on changing biochemical parameters and clinical efficacy in people treated for AH and/or DM. The quality of the selected studies was assessed based on the evaluation criteria of the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The random effects meta-analysis method was used to explain effect distribution between studies, by Stata® software (version 11.0) and publication bias was examined by visual inspection of graphs and Egger test. Results: We included 26 studies in the systematic review and 17 in the meta-analysis. These studies were published between 2014 to 2022 in 14 countries. Were reported improvement in knowledge and self-management of AH and DM, social motivation with treatment and behavioral change, reduction in glycated hemoglobin values, fasting glucose and blood pressure, improvement in adherence to drug treatment, among others. The result of the meta-analysis showed that there is evidence that the use of mobile applications can help reduce glycated hemoglobin by 0.39% compared to the usual care group. Conclusions: Monitoring and self-monitoring of behaviors and health care related to AH and DM in adults and the elderly through mobile applications, has clinically significant effectiveness in reducing glycated hemoglobin levels. Future studies should provide more evidence and recommendations for best practices and development of digital health interventions. Trial registration: PROSPERO. International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews. CRD42022361928.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-023-09879-6

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis by de Souza Ferreira et al., including 17 trials, showed a 0.39% (95% CI 0.24 to 0.54) reduction in HbA1c with mobile apps for monitoring diabetes and hypertension compared to traditional care.

    “Among reviews concerned with diabetes and mHealth system, a meta-analysis study by de Souza Ferreira and colleagues, including 17 trials on diabetes highlighted the effectiveness of mobile apps for monitoring diabetes and hypertension, showing a 0.39% (95% CI 0.24 to 0.54) reduction in HbA1c compared to traditional care (32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Souza Ferreira, E., de Aguiar Franco, F., dos Santos Lara, M. M., Levcovitz, A. A., Dias, M. A., Moreira, T. R., de Oliveira, A. H. M., & Cotta, R. M. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Tocantins (BR)
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2023-08-12
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
855-855
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385774197
Cited by
42
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (306358/2020)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais , Brasil (APQ-02708-21)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
mobile health apps, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic disease self-management, HbA1c, blood pressure control, fasting blood glucose, medication adherence, elderly patients, digital health interventions, behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypertension, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review