The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of digital health technologies adoption on healthcare workers’ performance and workload: perspective with DOI and TOE models
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHT) have become an integral component of modern healthcare systems, offering the potential to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes. Guided by the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, this study examines the impact of DHT adoption on healthcare workers' performance and workload in public and private hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia. METHOD: A stratified random sampling approach was used to collect data from 286 healthcare workers in public and private hospitals. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test hypotheses and assess direct and mediating relationships among variables. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that DHT significantly improves healthcare workers' performance and workload respectively (β = 0.452, C.R. = 10.150, p < 0.001) and (β = 0.594, C.R. = 9.972, p < 0.001), organizational and environmental factors are positively impacting on healthcare workers' performance (β = 0.327, C.R. = 8.709, p < 0.001) and (β = 0.102, C.R. = 2.872, p = 0.004). Healthcare workers' performance significantly reduces workload (β = 0.594, C.R. = 9.972, p < 0.001) and the mediating role of healthcare workers' performance between DHT and workload were also confirmed (β = 0.281, C.R. = 5.9787, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the critical role of DHT in enhancing healthcare workers' performance and reducing workload, with the TOE framework and performance acting as significant mediators. These results provide actionable insights for healthcare administrators and policymakers to optimize DHT implementation, support workforce efficiency, and address workload challenges through strategic organizational and environmental adaptations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The framework emphasizes identifying facilitators and barriers to the adoption of a specific technology, rather than providing guidance on governing the broader range of technologies implemented within organizations23–26.”
From Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 · Cited by 8,088
A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01605 · Cited by 3,280
Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results
Kim, J. (2019) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kja.19087 · Cited by 3,032
A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004 · Cited by 3,008
The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework
Baker, J. (2012) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12 · Cited by 1,275
Research Commentary —The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead
Agarwal, R., Gao, G. G., DesRoches, C. M., & Jha, A. K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0327 · Cited by 1,088
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Mulukuntla S, Pamulaparthyvenkata S. “Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Evaluating the Impact of Telemedicine and Health Information Systems on Patient Care”, EPH - Int. J Med Heal Sci. 2020;6(03):27–33.
- Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth edit. New York: Free Press; 2003.
- MT, TM Q Nguyen, “Balancing Security and Privacy in the Digital Age: An In-Depth Analysis of Legal and Regulatory Frameworks Impacting Cybersecurity Practices.,” Int J Intell Autom Comput. 2023;6(5):1–12. Available: https://research.tensorgate.org/index.php/IJIAC/article/view/61.
- Dwi B, Rahmawati Z, Mudayana AA. The Relationship between Workload and Work Discipline with Employee Performance at Nyi Ageng Serang Kulon Progo Hospital. Int J Healthc Res. 2022;5(2):32–42.
- O. M. H. K. An. R. A.-S. J. T. S. A.-A. M. F. Azam, “ANTECEDENTS OF BUSINESS ANALYTICS ADOPTION AND IMPACTS ON BANKS’ PERFORMANCE: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE TOE FRAMEWORK AND RESOURCE-BASED VIEW,” Interdiscip. J. Information, Knowledge, Manag. 2023;1(2010):150–154.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
Nkereuwem, O., Prauseová, J., Ford, R. P. K., Jallow, A. O., Marena, M., Jarju, G., Fofana, S., Cham, M., Manjang, B., Kampmann, B., et al. (2026) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0006244
Alothmany, R. D. (2026) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-01-2026-0048
Nurwahida, N., Ismanto, I., & Astaginy, N. (2026) · JURNAL ECONOMINA · doi:10.55681/economina.v5i10.4760
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeilani, A., & Hussein, A.
- Affiliations
- Mogadishu University (SO)
- Benadir University (SO)
- Corresponding author
- Jeilani, Abdulkadir
- ORCID
- Jeilani, Abdulkadir
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2025-02-18
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 271-271
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11837663
- OpenAlex
- W4407701754
- Semantic Scholar
- 1bb1af77af8460f281c969d3010450fd75380622
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 32
- FWCI
- 63.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Keywords
- digital health technologies, workload, technology-organization-environment framework, Doi model, technology adoption, public and private hospitals, mediating role of performance, Mogadishu
- MeSH terms
- Digital Technology, Digital Health, Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
