The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of multimorbidity on adult physical and mental health in low- and middle-income countries: what does the study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE) reveal?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases contribute a large share of disease burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Chronic diseases have a tendency to occur simultaneously and where there are two or more such conditions, this is termed as 'multimorbidity'. Multimorbidity is associated with adverse health outcomes, but limited research has been undertaken in LMICs. Therefore, this study examines the prevalence and correlates of multimorbidity as well as the associations between multimorbidity and self-rated health, activities of daily living (ADLs), quality of life, and depression across six LMICs. METHODS: Data was obtained from the WHO's Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) Wave-1 (2007/10). This was a cross-sectional population based survey performed in LMICs, namely China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa, including 42,236 adults aged 18 years and older. Multimorbidity was measured as the simultaneous presence of two or more of eight chronic conditions including angina pectoris, arthritis, asthma, chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, stroke, and vision impairment. Associations with four health outcomes were examined, namely ADL limitation, self-rated health, depression, and a quality of life index. Random-intercept multilevel regression models were used on pooled data from the six countries. RESULTS: The prevalence of morbidity and multimorbidity was 54.2 % and 21.9 %, respectively, in the pooled sample of six countries. Russia had the highest prevalence of multimorbidity (34.7 %) whereas China had the lowest (20.3 %). The likelihood of multimorbidity was higher in older age groups and was lower in those with higher socioeconomic status. In the pooled sample, the prevalence of 1+ ADL limitation was 14 %, depression 5.7 %, self-rated poor health 11.6 %, and mean quality of life score was 54.4. Substantial cross-country variations were seen in the four health outcome measures. The prevalence of 1+ ADL limitation, poor self-rated health, and depression increased whereas quality of life declined markedly with an increase in number of diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the challenge of multimorbidity in LMICs, particularly among the lower socioeconomic groups, and the pressing need for reorientation of health care resources considering the distribution of multimorbidity and its adverse effect on health outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barnett, K., Mercer, S. W., Norbury, M., Watt, G., Wyke, S., & Guthrie, B. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2 · Cited by 6,972
Kessler, R. C., & Üstün, T. B. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.168 · Cited by 4,771
Boyd, C. M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L. P., Boult, L., & Wu, A. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.716 · Cited by 2,581
The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries.
Abegunde, D. O., Mathers, C. D., Adam, T., Ortegon, M., & Strong, K. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61696-1 · Cited by 1,603 · cited 1×
“This is causing changes in the disease burden profiles of LMICs, with chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) becoming more common and growing public health challenge [2–5].”
Violan, C., Foguet-Boreu, Q., Flores-Mateo, G., Salisbury, C., Blom, J., Freitag, M., Glynn, L., Muth, C., & Valderas, J. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102149 · Cited by 1,125
The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study
Schmidt, S., Mühlan, H., & Power, M. (2006) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki155 · Cited by 570 · cited 1×
“Quality of life The 8-item WHO Quality of Life (WHOQoL) instrument was used to quantify quality of life and included two questions in each of four broad domains: physical, psychological, social, and environmental [48].”
Multimorbidity in primary care: prevalence and trend over the last 20 years
Uijen, A. A., & van de Lisdonk, E. H. (2008) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.1080/13814780802436093 · Cited by 505
Schäfer, I., Hansen, H., Schön, G., Höfels, S., Altiner, A., Dahlhaus, A., Gensichen, J., Riedel-Heller, S., Weyerer, S., Blank, W. A., et al. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-89 · Cited by 296
Hunger, M., Thorand, B., Schunk, M., Döring, A., Menn, P., Peters, A., & Holle, R. (2011) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-53 · Cited by 154
Cited by
The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing
Beard, J. R., Officer, A., de Carvalho, I. A., Sadana, R., Pot, A. M., Michel, J.-P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., Epping-Jordan, J. E., Peeters, G. M. E. E. (., Mahanani, W. R., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00516-4 · Cited by 3,287
Self-citationMultimorbidity and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Read, J. R., Sharpe, L., Modini, M., & Dear, B. F. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.009 · Cited by 869
Asogwa, O. A., Boateng, D., Marzà-Florensa, A., Peters, S., Levitt, N., van Olmen, J., & Klipstein-Grobusch, K. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049133 · Cited by 221
Syndemics: a new path for global health research
Mendenhall, E. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30602-5 · Cited by 174
Ali, M. K., Chwastiak, L., Poongothai, S., Emmert-Fees, K. M. F., Patel, S. A., Anjana, R. M., Sagar, R., Shankar, R., Sridhar, G. R., Kosuri, M., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.11747 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Arokiasamy, P., Uttamacharya, U., Jain, K., Biritwum, R. B., Yawson, A. E., Wu, F., Guo, Y., Maximova, T., Espinoza, B. M., Salinas Rodríguez, A., Afshar, S., Pati, S., Ice, G., Banerjee, S., Liebert, M. A., Snodgrass, J. J., Naidoo, N., Chatterji, S., & Kowal, P.
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2015-08-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 178-178
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1586227748
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.