Cited by 16Coagulation and Flocculation StudiesAlgal biology and biofuel productionMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Single-step dynamic dewatering of microalgae from dilute suspensions using flocculant assisted filtration

Open access
Musa, Mutah, Ward, Andrew, Ayoko, Godwin A., Rösch, Christine, Brown, Richard, Rainey, Thomas J.·2020·Microbial Cell Factories

Abstract

Background: Dewatering constitutes a major challenge to the production of microalgae, accounting for 20–30% of the product cost. This presents a setback for the applicability of microalgae in the development of several sustainable products. This study presents an investigation into the dynamic dewatering of microalgae in a combined flocculation-filtration process. The effect of process conditions on the performance of 12 flocculants and their mixtures was assessed. Results: The mechanism of flocculation via the electrostatic path was dominated by charge neutralization and subsequently followed bridging in a ‘sweep flocculation’ process. Cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) based flocculants recorded the highest biomass retention with PAM1 and PAM2 attaining 99 and 98% retention with flocculant dosages of 10 and 15 mg/L respectively. Polyvinylamine (PVAM) was also found to improve system stability across the pH range 4–10. Alum was observed to be only effective in charge neutralization, bringing the system close to its isoelectric point (IEP). Chemometric analysis using the multi-criteria decision methods, PROMETHEE and GAIA, was applied to provide a sequential performance ranking based on the net outranking flow (ф) from 207 observations. A graphical exploration of the flocculant performance pattern, grouping the observations into clusters in relation to the decision axis ($$\pi$$ π ), which indicated the weighted resultant of most favorable performance for all criteria was explored. Conclusion: CPAM based flocculants and their mixtures demonstrated superior performance due to their viscoelastic behaviour under turbulence. The use of PVAM or alum in mixtures with CPAM reduced the required doses of both flocculants, which will provide beneficial financial impact for largescale microalgae dewatering in a flocculant assisted dynamic filtration process. Chemometric analysis based on the physico-chemical properties of the system provides a time saving assessment of performance across several criteria. The study findings provide an important foundation for flocculant assisted dynamic filtration processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12934-020-01472-4

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sequential chemometric analysis of 209 observations across varying system conditions using PROMETHEE and GAIA was able to provide a complete ranking of the flocculants based on their outranking flow.

    “The sequential chemometric analysis of 209 observations across varying system conditions was assessed using the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) and graphical analysis for interactive aid (GAIA). This assessment was able to provide a complete ranking of the flocculants based on their outranking flow.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musa, M., Ward, A., Ayoko, G. A., Rösch, C., Brown, R., & Rainey, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Rainey, Thomas J.
Venue
Microbial Cell Factories
Published
2020-12
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
222-222
ISSN
1475-2859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110028645
Cited by
16
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbial Cell Factories (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KITopen (cc-by)
Funders
Queensland University of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
microalgae dewatering, cationic polyacrylamide, polyvinylamine, alum, sweep flocculation, charge neutralization, bridging flocculation, isoelectric point, biomass retention, PROMETHEE, Gaia, multi-criteria decision making, chemometrics, flocculant dosage optimization
MeSH terms
Polyacrylamides, Acrylic Resins, Filtration, Flocculation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Industrial Microbiology, Suspensions, Water, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Biomass, Static Electricity, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review