Cited by 271Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media in Health Education

Social media and digital technology use among Indigenous young people in Australia: a literature review

Open access
Rice, Emma S., Haynes, Emma, Royce, Paul, Thompson, Sandra C.·2016·International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of social media and digital technologies has grown rapidly in Australia and around the world, including among Indigenous young people who face social disadvantage. Given the potential to use social media for communication, providing information and as part of creating and responding to social change, this paper explores published literature to understand how Indigenous Australian youth use digital technologies and social media, and its positive and negative impacts. METHODS: Online literature searches were conducted in three databases: PubMed, Google Scholar and Informit in August 2014; with further searches of additional relevant databases (Engineering Village; Communication & mass media complete; Computers & applied sciences complete; Web of Science) undertaken in May 2015. In addition, relevant literature was gathered using citation snowballing so that additional peer-reviewed and grey literature was included. Articles were deemed relevant if they discussed social media and/or digital technologies and Indigenous Australians. After reading and reviewing all relevant articles, a thematic analysis was used to identify overall themes and identify specific examples. RESULTS: A total of 22 papers were included in the review. Several major themes were identified about how and why Indigenous young people use social media: identity, power and control, cultural compatibility and community and family connections. Examples of marketing for health and health promotion approaches that utilize social media and digital technologies were identified. Negative uses of social media such as cyber bullying, cyber racism and the exchange of sexually explicit content between minors are common with limited approaches to dealing with this at the community level. DISCUSSION: Strong cultural identity and community and family connections, which can be enhanced through social media, are linked to improved educational and health outcomes. The confidence that Indigenous young people demonstrate when approaching the use of social media invites its further use, including in arenas where this group may not usually participate, such as in research. CONCLUSIONS: Future research could examine ways to minimise the misuse of social media while maximising its positive potential in the lives of Indigenous young people. Future research should also focus on the positive application of social media and showing evidence in health promotion interventions in order to reduce health inequities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous young people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12939-016-0366-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The digital divide begins to narrow as most Indigenous Peoples, even in remote areas, now have access to a cellphone and use it to interact and communicate.

    “The digital divide, despite still needing improvements in terms of physical and non-physical access and equitable representation, begins to narrow as most Indigenous Peoples, even in remote areas, now have access to a cellphone and use it to interact and communicate (Carpenter et al., 2017; Rice et al., 2016).”

    From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Rice et al., 2016

    The Findings and Community and family connections sections report widespread mobile-phone availability in remote Australian communities and use of phones to communicate, particularly among Indigenous young people. They do not establish that most Indigenous people, including those in remote areas, have cellphone access. The Barriers to social media use section also identifies remoteness as a barrier. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have assisted ILR and Indigenous communities in sharing community and cultural knowledge, events, memes and snippets of language.

    “Although social media can have drawbacks and very real negatives such as cyber bullying and cyber racism, platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have assisted ILR and Indigenous communities in sharing community and cultural knowledge, events, memes and snippets of language (Castleton, 2018; Rice et al., 2016).”

    From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Rice et al., 2016

    The Community and family connections section describes Indigenous people sharing knowledge and stories on Twitter and events on Facebook. The Cultural compatibility of multimedia section discusses sharing cultural knowledge and using local languages online. The copy does not specifically address ILR or the sharing of memes and language snippets. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Indigenous youth can connect, affirm and give a voice to their own particular cultural and linguistic identities which have not been constructed, imagined, or set by outsiders.

    “Indigenous youth can connect, affirm and give a voice to their own particular cultural and linguistic identities which have not been constructed, imagined, or set by outsiders (Katsi’sorókwas Jacobs, 2019; Rice et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [7]Cunningham J Beneforti M Investigating indicators for measuring the health and social impact of sport and recreation programs in Australian indigenous communities Int Rev Soc Sport 2005 40 1 89 98 10.1177/1012690205052170 · DOI
  2. [14]Radoll P Cyber-safety and indigenous youth Indigenous Law Bulletin 2014 8 12 11
  3. [15]Gordon R McDermott L Stead M Angus K The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: what’s the evidence? Public health 2006 120 12 1133 9 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.008 17095026 · DOI
  4. [20]Vaarzon‐Morel P Pointing the phone: transforming technologies and social relations among Warlpiri Aust J Anthropol 2014 25 2 239 55 10.1111/taja.12091 · DOI
  5. [21]Kral I Shifting perceptions, shifting identities: communication technologies and the altered social, cultural and linguistic ecology in a remote indigenous context Aus J Anthropol 2014 25 2 171 89 10.1111/taja.12087 · DOI
  6. [22]Ginsburg F Rethinking documentary in the digital age Cine J 2006 46 1 128 33 10.1353/cj.2007.0001 · DOI
  7. [23]Petray TL Protest 2.0: online interactions and aboriginal activists Media Culture Soc 2011 33 6 923 40 10.1177/0163443711411009 · DOI
  8. [24]Sweet M Pearson L Dudgeon P @ IndigenousX: a case study of community-led innovation in digital media. Media international Australia Inc Culture Policy 2013 149 104
  9. [26]Brusse C Gardner K Mcaullay D Dowden M Social media and mobile apps for health promotion in Australian indigenous populations: scoping review J. Med. Internet Res 2014 16 12 e280 10.2196/jmir.3614 25498835 PMC4275496 · DOI
  10. [28]Sweet MA Social media: new links for Indigenous health Med J Aust 2013 199 1 18 10.5694/mja13.10429 23829246 · DOI
  11. [32]Rae K Weatherall L Hollebone K Apen K Mclean M Blackwell C Developing research in partnership with aboriginal communities - strategies for improving recruitment and retention Rural Remote Health 2013 13 2 2255 23548075
  12. [34]Herborn D Racial vilification and social media Indigenous Law Bulletin 2013 8 4 16 9
  13. [35]Walker S, Sanci L, Temple-Smith M. Sexting and young people: Experts’ views. Youth Studies Australia 2011, 30(4):8-16.
  14. [36]Rekhari S Indigenous communities and new media: questions on the global digital age J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 2009 7 2/3 175 81 10.1108/14779960910955882 · DOI
  15. [41]Lupton D. Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary. Health Promot Int. 2015;30(1):174-83. 25320120

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rice, E. S., Haynes, E., Royce, P., & Thompson, S. C.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Rice, Emma S.
Venue
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2016-05-25
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
81-81
ISSN
1475-9276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2400886571
Cited by
271
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal for Equity in Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Healthway
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
social media use, digital technology use, Indigenous youth, Indigenous Australians, cultural identity, cyberbullying, health promotion, health disparities, social deprivation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude to Health, Australia, Humans, Technology, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review