CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Health Policy Implementation ScienceInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationMental Health and Patient Involvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) evidence base: colloquium proceedings and research direction

Open access
for the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network, Boland, L., Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., Graham, I. D.·2020·Health Research Policy and Systems
DOI 10.1186/s12961-019-0521-3PMC PMC6972018
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) is a model of research co-production, whereby researchers partner with knowledge users throughout the research process and who can use the research recommendations in practice or policy. IKT approaches are used to improve the relevance and impact of research. As an emerging field, however, the evidence underpinning IKT is in active development. The Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network represents a collaborative interdisciplinary team that aims to advance the state of IKT science. Methods: In 2017, the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network issued a call to its members for concept papers to further define IKT, outline an IKT research agenda, and inform the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network’s special meeting entitled, Integrated Knowledge Translation State of the Science Colloquium, in Ottawa, Canada (2018). At the colloquium, authors presented concept papers and discussed knowledge-gaps for a research agenda and implications for advancing the IKT field. We took detailed field notes, audio-recorded the meeting and analysed the data using qualitative content analysis. Results: Twenty-four participants attended the meeting, including researchers (n = 11), trainees (n = 6) and knowledge users (n = 7). Seven overarching categories emerged from these proceedings – IKT theory, IKT methods, IKT process, promoting partnership, definitions and distinctions of key IKT terms, capacity-building, and role of funders. Within these categories, priorities identified for future IKT research included: (1) improving clarity about research co-production/IKT theories and frameworks; (2) describing the process for engaging knowledge users; and (3) identifying research co-production/IKT outcomes and methods for evaluation. Conclusion: The Integrated Knowledge Translation State of the Science Colloquium initiated a research agenda to advance IKT science and practice. Next steps will focus on building a theoretical and evidence base for IKT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12961-019-0521-3

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. CIHR. Evaluation of CIHR’s knowledge translation funding program. 2013. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/47332.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2019.
  2. Graham ID, Tetroe J, MacLean R. Some basics of integrated knowledge translation research (Chapter 1). In: Graham, Tetroe, Pierson, editors. Practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation. Adelaide: Lippincott-JBI; 2014. Book 21.
  3. Salsberg J, et al. Integrated knowledge translation and participatory research (Chapter 2). In: Graham, Tetroe, Pierson, editors. Practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation; 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
for the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network, Boland, L., Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., & Graham, I. D.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Graham, I. D.
ORCID
Venue
Health Research Policy and Systems
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-01-20
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12961-019-0521-3
PMC
PMC6972018
OpenAlex
W3003132063
Cited by
106
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN #143237)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
integrated knowledge translation, co-production of research, knowledge users, research collaboration, research agenda, capacity building, research impact
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Evidence-Based Practice, Translational Research, Biomedical, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review