Cited by 21Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

Brief interventions to address substance use among patients presenting to emergency departments in resource poor settings: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Open access
Dwommoh, Rebecca, Sorsdahl, Katherine, Myers, Bronwyn, Asante, Kwaku Poku, Naledi, Tracey, Stein, Dan J., Cleary, Susan·2018·Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Abstract

Background: There are limited data describing the cost-effectiveness of brief interventions for substance use in resource-poor settings. Using a patient and provider perspective, this study investigates the cost-effectiveness of a brief motivational interviewing (MI) intervention versus a combined intervention of MI and problem solving therapy (MI-PST) for reducing substance use among patients presenting to emergency departments, in comparison to a control group. Methods: Effectiveness data were extracted from Project STRIVE (Substance use and Trauma InterVention) conducted in South Africa. Patients were randomised to either receive 1 session of MI (n = 113) or MI in addition to four sessions of PST (n = 109) or no intervention [control (n = 110)]. Costs included the direct health care costs associated with the interventions. Patient costs included out of pocket payments incurred accessing the MI-PST intervention. Outcome measures were patients’ scores on the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Use Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Results: Cost per patient was low in all three groups; US$16, US$33 and US$11, and for MI, MI-PST and control respectively. Outcomes were 0.92 (MI), 1.06 (MI-PST) and 0.88 (control) for ASSIST scores; and 0.74 (MI), 1.27 (MI-PST) and 0.53 (control) for CES-D scores. In comparison to the control group, the MI intervention costs an additional US$119 per unit reduction in ASSIST score, (US$20 for CES-D); MI-PST in comparison to MI costs US$131 or US$33 per unit reduction in ASSIST or CES-D scores respectively. The sensitivity analyses showed that increasing the number of patients who screened positive and thus received the intervention could improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Conclusion: MI or MI-PST interventions delivered by lay counsellors have the potential to be cost-effective strategies for the reduction of substance use disorder and depressive symptoms among patients presenting at emergency departments in resource poor settings. Given the high economic, social and health care cost of substance use disorders in South Africa, these results suggest that these interventions should be carefully considered for future implementation. Trial registration This study is part of a trial registered with the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201308000591418)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12962-018-0109-8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dwommoh et al. conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of MI intervention compared to MI-PST and Control and found that MI or MI-PST delivered by lay counsellors were cost-effective strategies for reducing SUD for emergency department patients compared to a control condition.

    “Dwommoh et al. [116] conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of MI intervention compared to MI-PST and Control and found that MI or MI-PST delivered by lay counsellors were cost-effective strategies for the reducing SUD for emergency department patients compared to a control condition (leaflet providing information on the effects of substance use) [116].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [116]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two studies conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of BI in Uganda and South Africa.

    “Two studies conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of BI in Uganda [115] and South Africa [116]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwommoh, R., Sorsdahl, K., Myers, B., Asante, K. P., Naledi, T., Stein, D. J., & Cleary, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Kintampo Health Research Centre (GH)
  • Western Cape Department of Health (ZA)
Corresponding author
Dwommoh, Rebecca
Venue
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Published
2018-06-18
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
1478-7547 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808248694
Cited by
21
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Health of the Western Cape Government (Not Applicable)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
brief intervention, substance use disorders, motivational interviewing, problem-solving therapy, emergency department patients, resource-limited settings, cost-effectiveness, alcohol consumption, smoking, depression, lay counselors, South Africa, ASSIST, CES-D, out-of-pocket costs, screening and referral, implementation barriers and facilitators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review