Cited by 89Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a brief intervention delivered to problem drinkers presenting at an inner-city hospital emergency department

Kunz, F Michael, French, Michael T, Bazargan-Hejazi, Shahrzad·2004·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) has gained widespread acceptance as an effective method for reducing problem drinking in at-risk populations. This study examines the cost and cost-effectiveness of an SBI pilot program delivered in an inner-city hospital emergency department (ED) to a traditionally underserved population. METHOD: A total of 1,036 subjects were screened for problem drinking during their visit to an ED. Eligible participants (N = 294) were randomly assigned to either a brief intervention group or a control group. As the result of attrition, a final sample of 194 (90 brief intervention; 104 control) participants remained at follow-up. The intervention consisted of a brief counseling session and a health information packet. The control group received only the packet. Intervention cost data were collected and analyzed using the Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program. Selected outcomes at the 3-month follow-up included the raw Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score, average weekly number of drinks and engaging in heavy drinking in the past month (>6 drinks on one occasion for men, >4 for women). Outcome differences between the intervention and control groups were estimated with both bivariate and multivariate techniques. RESULTS: The average economic cost of the brief intervention was dollars 632 per subject, of which screening (dollars 497) was the largest component. In all cases, intervention subjects had better 3-month outcomes than control subjects, but the differences were not always statistically significant. Cost-effectiveness ratios were relatively small for all three outcomes, suggesting this type of intervention has the potential to be cost-effective under full implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results demonstrate the potential advantage of further research in this area with larger samples and a longer follow-up period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.363

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kunz 2004 had high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data because data (baseline and follow-up) were reported only for those not lost to follow-up.

    “Data (baseline and follow-up) reported only for those not lost to follow-up”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunz, F. M., French, M. T., & Bazargan-Hejazi, S.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
2004-05
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
363-370
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W1976123855
Cited by
89
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U24AA011899, R01AA013167, U24AA-11899, R01 AA 13167)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol screening, brief intervention, cost-effectiveness, problem drinking, emergency department, inner-city hospital, underserved populations, alcoholism, heavy drinking, intervention costs, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Psychotherapy, Brief, Urban Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review