Cited by 46Urban Transport and AccessibilityInjury Epidemiology and PreventionTraffic and Road Safety

Impact of offering cycle training in schools upon cycling behaviour: a natural experimental study

Open access
Goodman, Anna, van Sluijs, Esther M. F., Ogilvie, David·2016·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: England's national cycle training scheme, 'Bikeability', aims to give children in England the confidence to cycle more. There is, however, little evidence on the effectiveness of cycle training in achieving this. We therefore examined whether delivering Bikeability was associated with cycling frequency or with independent cycling. METHODS: We conducted a natural experimental study using information on children aged 10-11 years participating in the nationally-representative Millennium Cohort Study. We identified Cohort participants whose schools had offered Bikeability in 2011-2012 using operational Bikeability delivery data (children in London excluded, as delivery data not available). Our natural experimental design capitalised on the fact that Cohort participants were surveyed at different times during 2012 and were also offered Bikeability at different times during 2012. This allowed us to compare cycling levels between children whose schools delivered Bikeability before their survey interview ('intervention group', N = 2563) and an otherwise comparable group of children whose schools delivered Bikeability later in the year ('control group', N = 773). Parents reported whether their child had completed formal cycle training; their child's cycling frequency; whether their child ever made local cycling trips without an adult; and other child and family factors. We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to examine whether cycling behaviour differed between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: Children whose school had offered Bikeability were much more likely to have completed cycle training than the control group (68% vs. 28%, p < 0.001). There was, however, no evidence that delivering Bikeability in school was associated with cycling more often (49.0% cycling at least once per week in the intervention group vs. 49.6% in the control group; adjusted risk ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.89, 1.10). There was likewise no evidence of an association with cycling independently (51.5% in the intervention group vs. 50.1% in the control group; adjusted risk ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.89, 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Offering high-quality cycle training free at the point of delivery in English schools encourages children to do cycle training, but we found no evidence of short-term effects on cycling frequency or independent cycling. Future evaluation should investigate longer-term effects on these and other stated Bikeability objectives such as increasing cycling safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-016-0356-z

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Cycling England Cycling England Mid-Term Review, 2008/9–2010/11 2010 London Cycling England
  2. [16]Department for Transport Cycling to school: a review of school census and Bikeability delivery data 2012 London Department for Transport

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, A., van Sluijs, E. M. F., & Ogilvie, D.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Anna
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2016-03-08
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
34-34
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294978052
Cited by
46
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (GB) (ES/L013606/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
cycling training, bikeability, cycling frequency, school-based intervention, active travel, children aged 10-11, Millennium Cohort Study, cyclist safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Child, Child Behavior, Education, England, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Safety, Schools, Cohort Studies, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review