Cited by 185Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Review of case definitions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)

Open access
Lim, Eun-Jin, Son, Chang-Gue·2020·Journal of Translational Medicine

Abstract

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disease with unknown causes. From the perspectives on the etiology and pathophysiology, ME/CFS has been labeled differently, which influenced changes in case definitions and terminologies. This review sought to feature aspects of the history, developments, and differential symptoms in the case definitions. Methods: A search was conducted through PubMed published to February 2020 using the following search keywords: case definition AND chronic fatigue syndrome [MeSH Terms]. All reference lists of the included studies were checked. Of the included studies, the number of citations and the visibility in the literatures of the definitions were considered for comparisons of the criteria. Results: Since the first 'ME' case definition was developed in 1986, 25 case definitions/diagnostic criteria were created based on three conceptual factors (etiology, pathophysiology, and exclusionary disorders). These factors can be categorized into four categories (ME, ME/CFS, CFS, and SEID) and broadly characterized according to primary disorder (ME-viral, CFS-unknown, ME/CFS-inflammatory, SEID-multisystemic), compulsory symptoms (ME and ME/CFS-neuroinflammatory, CFS and SEID-fatigue and/or malaise), and required conditions (ME-infective agent, ME/CFS, CFS, SEID-symptoms associated with fatigue, e.g., duration of illness). ME and ME/CFS widely cover all symptom categories, while CFS mainly covers neurologic and neurocognitive symptoms. Fatigue, cognitive impairment, PEM, sleep disorder, and orthostatic intolerance were the overlapping symptoms of the 4 categories, which were included as SEID criteria. Conclusions: This study comprehensively described the journey of the development of case definitions and compared the symptom criteria. This review provides broader insights and explanations to understand the complexity of ME/CFS for clinicians and researchers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12967-020-02455-0

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most included studies used well-established criteria for CFS inclusion.

    “Although it was not possible to calculate subgroup analyses based on the different diagnostic criteria used for inclusion of CFS patients, most included studies used well-established criteria [2].”

    From Efficacy and Acceptance of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Meta-analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Results identify eight prominently cited ME/CFS case definitions, and the Discussion says most studies and clinicians have used such definitions. The review does not establish which criteria were used by most studies included in the citing paper, so that specific part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Bethesda M. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) research: workshop report. State of the knowledge workshop. National Institutes of Health. 2011. https://www.meassociation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/SoK-Workshop-Report-508-compliant-8-5-11.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
  2. [5]Institute of Medicine. Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; Redefining an illness. Institute of medicine of the national academies. 2015. www.nap.edu. Accessed 12 Feb 2019. 25695122

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, E.-J., & Son, C.-G.
Affiliations
Daejeon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Son, Chang-Gue
Venue
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2020-07-29
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
289-289
ISSN
1479-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045864147
Cited by
185
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025221)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, case definition, diagnostic criteria, etiology, pathophysiology, post-infectious fatigue, post-viral fatigue, post-infectious encephalomyelitis, fatigue, cognitive impairment, post-exertional malaise, sleep disorder, orthostatic intolerance, symptom criteria
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Wake Disorders, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Orthostatic Intolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review