Cited by 1,026Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects

A report—Chronic fatigue syndrome: Guidelines for research

Open access
Sharpe, M C·1991·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014107689108400224

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharpe, M. C.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Sharpe, M C
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
1991-02
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
118-121
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W1538919177
Cited by
1,026
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, research guidelines, research priorities
MeSH terms
Humans, Methods, Research, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review