Cited by 27Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Does the effect of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) vary by patient characteristics? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Open access
Kuut, T. A., Buffart, L. M., Braamse, A. M. J., Csorba, I., Bleijenberg, G., Nieuwkerk, P., Moss-Morris, R., Müller, F. +1 more·2024·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Debate is ongoing on the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). With an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis we investigated whether the effect of CBT varied by patient characteristics. These included post-exertional malaise (PEM), a central feature of ME/CFS according to many. We searched for randomized controlled trials similar with respect to comparison condition, outcomes and treatment-protocol. Moderation on fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength, subscale fatigue severity), functional impairment (Sickness Impact Profile-8) and physical functioning (Short Form-36, subscale physical functioning) was investigated using linear mixed model analyses and interaction tests. PROSPERO (CRD42022358245). Data from eight trials ( n = 1298 patients) were pooled. CBT showed beneficial effects on fatigue severity ( β = −11.46, 95% CI −15.13 to −7.79); p < 0.001, functional impairment (β = −448.40, 95% CI −625.58 to −271.23); p < 0.001; and physical functioning (β = 9.64, 95% CI 3.30 to 15.98); p < 0.001. The effect of CBT on fatigue severity varied by age ( p interaction = 0.003), functional impairment ( p interaction = 0.045) and physical activity pattern ( p interaction = 0.027). Patients who were younger, reported less functional impairments and had a fluctuating activity pattern benefitted more. The effect on physical functioning varied by self-efficacy ( p interaction = 0.025), with patients with higher self-efficacy benefitting most. No other moderators were found. It can be concluded from this study that CBT for ME/CFS can lead to significant reductions of fatigue, functional impairment, and physical limitations. There is no indication patients meeting different case definitions or reporting additional symptoms benefit less from CBT. Our findings do not support recent guidelines in which evidence from studies not mandating PEM was downgraded.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291723003148

Cites

42 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recently published individual patient data meta-analysis in CBT for CFS had a data base limited to a specific treatment-protocol and was therefore less generalizable.

    “While there is a recently published individual patient data meta-analysis in CBT for CFS [49], the data base for that project was limited to a specific treatment-protocol (e.g., [50]) and therefore less generalizable.”

    From Efficacy and Acceptance of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Meta-analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The limitations discussion (Psychological Medicine, p. 451) confirms that eligibility criteria restricted the CBT protocols included and calls for replication with other protocols. But the same discussion says the protocols have more similarities than differences and that the findings are likely generalizable to other CBT protocols, contrary to the claim’s conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These results are in line with previous research, indicating that CBT can alleviate CFS symptoms and improve patients' overall well-being.

    “All in all, these results are in line with previous research [8, 11, 12, 16, 49], indicating that CBT can alleviate CFS symptoms and improve patients’ overall well-being.”
  • A recently published individual patient data meta-analysis did not find evidence suggesting that patients meeting different case definitions or reporting additional symptoms benefited less from CBT.

    “However, a recently published individual patient data meta-analysis did not find evidence suggesting that patients meeting different case definitions or reporting additional symptoms benefited less from CBT [49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuut, T. A., Buffart, L. M., Braamse, A. M. J., Csorba, I., Bleijenberg, G., Nieuwkerk, P., Moss-Morris, R., Müller, F., & Knoop, H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Knoop, H.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2023-11-06
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
447-456
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W4388414943
Cited by
27
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic fatigue syndrome, post-exertional malaise, fatigue severity, functional disability, physical function, treatment moderators, age, self-efficacy, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review