Cited by 80Reproductive Health and TechnologiesGender, Health, and Social InequalityReproductive Health and Contraception

'I am always crying on the inside': a qualitative study on the implications of infertility on women's lives in urban Gambia

Open access
Dierickx, Susan, Rahbari, Ladan, Longman, Chia, Jaiteh, Fatou, Coene, Gily·2018·Reproductive Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing awareness that infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa constitutes a severe social and public health problem. Few of the existing studies on infertility explicitly take into account the differences between women. However, how women experience infertility is formed by their various social positions. This research explores the implications of infertility on women's lives in urban Gambia and aims to provide an in-depth understanding of how this relates to gender and cultural norms as well as different social positions. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected through interviews (33), group discussions (13), participatory observations (14) and informal conversations (31). Purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used to identify participants. The data was analysed thematically using NVivo 11. RESULTS: Results showed that there was strong social pressure on urban women in The Gambia to procreate. Unable to conform to their gender role, women with infertility were confronted with financial problems, social stigma, as well as emotional and physical violence in their marriage. All women expressed feelings of trauma, stress and sadness. The intersectional approach used in this study highlighted how different positions influenced women's experiences of infertility. Urban women with a high socio-economic status had a more powerful position within their marriages and the broader community, due to their financial position, professional career and, sometimes, their educational background. In contrast, women from a lower socio-economic background were more likely to be harshly confronted with the social stigma of infertility. CONCLUSION: The lives of most women with infertility in The Gambia are characterized by social suffering resulting from gender and pro-natal norms, cultural beliefs and moral concerns, cultural practices and limited access to health care. An intersectional approach is an effective tool to inform public health and social policy since it highlights how, in specific situations, certain groups are more vulnerable than others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12978-018-0596-2

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [56]Scheyvens R Storey D Scheyvens R Storey D Introduction Development fieldwork. A practical guide 2006 London SAGE Publications 1 15
  2. [58]Kleinman A Das V Lock MM Social suffering 1997 Berkeley University of California Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dierickx, S., Rahbari, L., Longman, C., Jaiteh, F., & Coene, G.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • MRC Unit the Gambia (GM)
Corresponding author
Dierickx, Susan
Venue
Reproductive Health
Published
2018-09-12
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
151-151
ISSN
1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891639777
Cited by
80
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Global Mind Fund Operational Grant
  • VLIRUOS
  • University Foundation Belgium (WI 249)
  • Belgian Department of Development Cooperation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
infertility, women's experiences, gender norms, social stigma, intersectionality, socioeconomic status, marital violence, psychological trauma, access to reproductive health services, urban women, Gambia
MeSH terms
Adult, Crying, Female, Gambia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infertility, Female, Social Class, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review