The DOI matches its Crossref record; 216 of the 216 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are widely used in many fields, especially in biomedical applications. Currently, many studies have investigated the biocompatibility and toxicity of GFNs in vivo and in intro. Generally, GFNs may exert different degrees of toxicity in animals or cell models by following with different administration routes and penetrating through physiological barriers, subsequently being distributed in tissues or located in cells, eventually being excreted out of the bodies. This review collects studies on the toxic effects of GFNs in several organs and cell models. We also point out that various factors determine the toxicity of GFNs including the lateral size, surface structure, functionalization, charge, impurities, aggregations, and corona effect ect. In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, (toll-like receptors-) TLR-, transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways. In this review, we summarize the available information on regulating factors and the mechanisms of GFNs toxicity, and propose some challenges and suggestions for further investigations of GFNs, with the aim of completing the toxicology mechanisms, and providing suggestions to improve the biological safety of GFNs and facilitate their wide application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Hengartner, M. O. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037710 · Cited by 5,779
Structure and function of the blood–brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Patabendige, A. A. K., Dolman, D. E. M., Yusof, S. R., & Begley, D. J. (2010) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 · Cited by 5,185
The Nuclear Factor NF- B Pathway in Inflammation
Lawrence, T. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001651 · Cited by 4,898
Methods in Mammalian Autophagy Research
Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T., & Levine, B. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028 · Cited by 4,497
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368
Antimicrobial Autophagy: A Conserved Innate Immune Response in Drosophila
Moy, R. H., & Cherry, S. (2013) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000350326 · Cited by 3,539
Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications
Loh, K. P., Bao, Q., Eda, G., & Chhowalla, M. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.907 · Cited by 3,340
Cited by
End-to-end design of wearable sensors
Ates, H. C., Nguyen, P. Q., Gonzalez-Macia, L., Morales-Narváez, E., Güder, F., Collins, J. J., & Dincer, C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00460-x · Cited by 1,306
Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges
Gavas, S., Quazi, S., & Karpiński, T. M. (2021) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-021-03628-6 · Cited by 1,069
Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications: A Recent Study
Maiti, D., Tong, X., Mou, X., & Yang, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01401 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Ou, L., Song, B., Liang, H., Liu, J., Feng, X., Deng, B., Sun, T., & Shao, L.
- Venue
- Particle and Fibre Toxicology
- Published
- 2016-10-31
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-57
- ISSN
- 1743-8977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2542924420
- Cited by
- 803
- References
- 216
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
- The paper
- Ou, L., Song, B., Liang, H., Liu, J., Feng, X., Deng, B., Sun, T., & Shao, L. (2016). Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.