CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic health and occupational medicinePublic Health and Social Inequalities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Power asymmetries in global governance for health: a conceptual framework for analyzing the political-economic determinants of health inequities

Open access
Kentikelenis, Alexander, Rochford, Connor·2019·Globalization and Health
DOI 10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4PMC PMC6881908
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Recent scholarship has increasingly identified global power asymmetries as the root cause of health inequities. This article examines how such asymmetries manifest in global governance for health, and how this impacts health outcomes. Results: We focus on the political-economic determinants of global health inequities, and how these determinants operate at different levels of social action (micro, meso, and macro) through distinct but interacting mechanisms. To clarify how these mechanisms operate, we develop an integrative framework for examining the links between global neoliberalism—the currently dominant policy paradigm premised on advancing the reach of markets and promoting ever-growing international economic integration—and global health inequities, and show how these mechanisms have macro–macro, macro–meso–macro, and macro–micro–macro manifestations. Conclusions: Our approach enables the design of theoretically-nuanced empirical strategies to document the multiple ways in which the political economy entrenches or, alternatively, might ameliorate global health inequities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Multiple levels of analysis and the origins of health inequity. Source: Authors, drawing on Jepperson and Meyer [29]
Fig. 1 Multiple levels of analysis and the origins of health inequity. Source: Authors, drawing on Jepperson and Meyer [29]CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Ottersen OP, Dasgupta J, Blouin C, Buss P, Chongsuvivatwong V, Frenk J, et al. The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):630–67. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Frenk J, Moon S. Governance challenges in global health. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(10):936–42. · DOI
  3. Labonté R, Schrecker T. Globalization and social determinants of health: introduction and methodological background (part 1 of 3). Glob Health. 2007;3:5–5. · DOI
  4. Forster T, Kentikelenis A, Stubbs TH, King L. Globalization and health equity: the impact of structural adjustment programs on developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112496. · DOI
  5. McColl K. Europe told to deliver more aid for health. Lancet. 2008;371(9630):2072–3. · DOI
  6. Hoffman SJ, Cole CB. Defining the global health system and systematically mapping its network of actors. Glob Health. 2018;14(1):38. · DOI
  7. Szlezák NA, Bloom BR, Jamison DT, Keusch GT, Michaud CM, Moon S, et al. The global health system: actors, norms, and expectations in transition. PLoS Med. 2010;7(1):e1000183. · DOI
  8. Gostin LO, Mok EA. Grand challenges in global health governance. Br Med Bull. 2009;90(1):7–18. · DOI
  9. Marmot MG, Allen J, Bell R, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet. 2012;380(9846):1011–29. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M. Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(4):284–91. · DOI
  11. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(1_suppl2):19–31. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gkiouleka A, Huijts T, Beckfield J, Bambra C. Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: inequalities, intersectionality & institutions: a research agenda. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:92–8. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(suppl 1):6–20. · DOI
  14. Moon S, Szlezák NA, Michaud CM, Jamison DT, Keusch GT, Clark WC, et al. The global health system: lessons for a stronger institutional framework. PLoS Med. 2010;7(1):e1000193. · DOI
  15. Kickbusch I. Action on global health: addressing global health governance challenges. Public Health. 2005;119(11):969–73. · DOI
  16. Kickbusch I, Reddy KS. Global health governance – the next political revolution. Public Health. 2015;129(7):838–42. · DOI
  17. Kenworthy NJ, MacKenzie R, Lee K, editors. Case studies on corporations and Global Health governance: impacts, influence and accountability. Not Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2016.
  18. Lee K, Kamradt-Scott A. The multiple meanings of global health governance: a call for conceptual clarity. Glob Health. 2014;10(1):28. · DOI
  19. Clinton C, Sridhar D. Governing global health: who runs the world and why? Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
  20. Held D, Kickbusch I, McNally K, Piselli D, Told M. Gridlock, innovation and resilience in global health governance. Global Policy. 2019;10(2):161–77. · DOI
  21. Halliday TC. Recursivity of global normmaking: a sociolegal agenda. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci. 2009;5(1):263–89. · DOI
  22. Florini A. The evolution of international norms. Int Stud Q. 1996;40(3):363–89. · DOI
  23. Björkdahl A. Norms in international relations: some conceptual and methodological reflections. Camb Rev Int Aff. 2002;15(1):9–23. · DOI
  24. Chorev N. Changing global norms through reactive diffusion: the case of intellectual property protection of AIDS drugs. Am Sociol Rev. 2012;77(5):831–53. · DOI
  25. Lukes S. Methodological individualism reconsidered. Br J Sociol. 1968;19(2):119–29. · DOI
  26. List C, Spiekermann K. Methodological individualism and holism in political science: a reconciliation. Am Pol Sci Rev. 2013;107(4):629–43. · DOI
  27. Kincaid H. Philosophical foundations of the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
  28. Jepperson R, Meyer JW. Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms. Sociol Theory. 2011;29(1):54–73. · DOI
  29. Weber M. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1978.
  30. Schattschneider EE. The Semisovereign people: a realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1960.
  31. Abraham J. The pharmaceutical industry as a political player. Lancet. 2002;360(9344):1498–502. · DOI
  32. Lukes S. Power: a radical view. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. · DOI
  33. McGoey L, Thiel D, West R, Narcy F. Philanthrocapitalism and crimes of the powerful. Politix. 2018;121(1):29–54. · DOI
  34. Shiffman J. Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(6):297–9. · DOI
  35. Domhoff GW. The power elite and the state: how policy is made in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1990.
  36. Kentikelenis AE, Seabrooke L. The politics of world polity: script-writing in international organizations. Am Sociol Rev. 2017;82(5):1065–92. · DOI
  37. Koppell JGS. Accountable global governance organizations. In: Bovens M, Goodin RE, Schillemans T, editors. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 370–86.
  38. Simmons BA, Dobbin F, Geoffrey Garrett, eds. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. · DOI
  39. Dobbin F, Simmons BA, Garrett G. The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annu Rev Sociol. 2007;33(1):449–72. · DOI
  40. Reinsberg B, Kentikelenis AE, Stubbs TH, King LP. The world system and the hollowing-out of state capacity: how structural adjustment programs impact bureaucratic quality in developing countries. Am J Sociol. 2019;123(4):1222–57. · DOI
  41. Reinsberg B, Stubbs T, Kentikelenis A, King L. Bad governance: how privatization increases corruption in the developing world: how privatization increases corruption. Regul Governance. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12265. · DOI
  42. Mann M. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. Eur J Sociol. 1984;25(2):185–213. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Chorev N, Shadlen KC. Intellectual property, access to medicines, and health: new research horizons. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2015;50(2):143–56. · DOI
  44. Lencucha R. Philip Morris versus Uruguay: health governance challenged. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):852–3. · DOI
  45. Kickbusch I, Hanefeld J. Role for academic institutions and think tanks in speeding progress on sustainable development goals. BMJ. 2017;24:j3519. · DOI
  46. Bourdieu P. Social space and symbolic power. Sociol Theory. 1989;7(1):14–25. · DOI
  47. Chorev N. The World Health Organization between north and south. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2012. · DOI
  48. Aso T. Crucial role of finance ministry in achieving universal health coverage. Lancet. 2017;390(10111):2415–7. · DOI
  49. Feldbaum H, Lee K, Michaud J. Global health and foreign policy. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):82–92. · DOI
  50. Chorev N. Restructuring neoliberalism at the World Health Organization. Rev Int Polit Econ. 2013;20(4):627–66. · DOI
  51. Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M. Global health philanthropy and institutional relationships: how should conflicts of interest be addressed? PLoS Med. 2011;8(4):e1001020. · DOI
  52. McCoy D, Chand S, Sridhar D. Global health funding: how much, where it comes from and where it goes. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(6):407–17. · DOI · Paper page
  53. McCoy D, Kembhavi G, Patel J, Luintel A. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s grant-making programme for global health. Lancet. 2009;373(9675):1645–53. · DOI
  54. TechnoServe. The Coca-Cola Company, TechnoServe and the Gates Foundation partner to boost incomes of 50,000 small-scale farmers in East Africa. 2010. https://www.technoserve.org/press-room/detail/the-coca-cola-company-technoserve-and-the-gates-foundation-partner-to-boost. Accessed 10 Oct 2019.
  55. Barlow P, Serôdio P, Ruskin G, McKee M, Stuckler D. Science organisations and Coca-Cola’s ‘war’ with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(9):761–3. · DOI
  56. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804–14. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Scott WR. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1995.
  58. Hironaka A. Greening the globe: world society and environmental change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. · DOI
  59. Schofer E, Hironaka A, Frank DJ, Longhofer W. Sociological institutionalism and world society. In: Amenta E, Nash K, Scott A, editors. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to political sociology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 57–68. · DOI
  60. Kentikelenis A, Babb SL. The making of neoliberal globalization: norm substitution and the politics of clandestine institutional change. Am J Sociol. 2019;124(6):1720–62. · DOI
  61. Babb SL, Kentikelenis AE. International financial institutions as agents of neoliberalism. In: Cahill D, Cooper M, Konings M, Primrose D, editors. The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2018. p. 16–27. · DOI
  62. Forster T, Kentikelenis AE, Reinsberg B, Stubbs TH, King LP. How structural adjustment programs affect inequality: a disaggregated analysis of IMF conditionality, 1980–2014. Soc Sci Res. 2019;80:83–113. · DOI
  63. Kentikelenis AE, King LP, McKee M, Stuckler D. The International Monetary Fund and the Ebola outbreak. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;3(2):e69–70. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Gilson L, McIntyre D. Removing user fees for primary care in Africa: the need for careful action. BMJ. 2005;331(7519):762–5. · DOI
  65. Yates R. Universal health care and the removal of user fees. Lancet. 2009;373(9680):2078–81. · DOI
  66. Chorev N, Babb SL. The crisis of neoliberalism and the future of international institutions: a comparison of the IMF and the WTO. Theory Soc. 2009;38(5):459–84. · DOI
  67. Wade RH. Greening the bank: the struggle over the environment, 1970–1995. In: Lewis JP, Kapur D, Webb RC, editors. The World Bank: its first half century, vol. II. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1997. p. 611–734.
  68. Boyle EH, Meyer JW. Modern law as a secularized and global model: implications for the sociology of law. Soziale Welt. 1998;49(3):213–32.
  69. Drori GS, Meyer JW, Hwang H, editors. Globalization and organization: world society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  70. Meyer JW. World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36(1):1–20. · DOI
  71. Hanrieder T. How do professions globalize? Lessons from the south in US medical education. Int Political Sociol. 2019;13(3):296–314. · DOI
  72. Horton R. Offline: the case against global health. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1705. · DOI
  73. Scott JC. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1985.
  74. Berliner LS, Kenworthy NJ. Producing a worthy illness: personal crowdfunding amidst financial crisis. Soc Sci Med. 2017;187:233–42. · DOI
  75. Volpp KG, Asch DA. Make the healthy choice the easy choice: using behavioral economics to advance a culture of health. QJM. 2017;110(5):271–5.
  76. Harvey D. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
  77. Centeno MA, Cohen JN. The arc of neoliberalism. Annu Rev Sociol. 2012;38(1):317–40. · DOI
  78. Labonté R, Stuckler D. The rise of neoliberalism: how bad economics imperils health and what to do about it. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(3):312–9. · DOI
  79. Schrecker T. Neoliberalism and health: the linkages and the dangers. Sociol Compass. 2016;10(10):952–71. · DOI
  80. Schrecker T, Bambra C. How politics makes us sick: neoliberal epidemics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. · DOI
  81. Stubbs TH, Kentikelenis AE. Targeted social safeguards in the age of universal social protection: the IMF and health systems of low-income countries. Crit Public Health. 2018;28(2):132–9. · DOI
  82. Fourcade-Gourinchas M, Babb SL. The rebirth of the liberal creed: paths to neoliberalism in four countries. Am J Sociol. 2002;108(3):533–79. · DOI
  83. Broome A, Seabrooke L. Shaping policy curves: cognitive authority in transnational capacity building. Public Adm. 2015;93(4):956–72. · DOI
  84. Milanovic B. Global inequality: a new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2016. · DOI
  85. Forster T, Kentikelenis A, Bambra C. Health inequalities in Europe: setting the stage for progressive policy action. Dublin: Foundation for European Progressive Studies & Think-tank for Action on Social Change; 2018.
  86. Hall PA, Lamont M, editors. Successful societies: how institutions and culture affect health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  87. Hall PA, Lamont M, editors. Social resilience in the neo-Liberal era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
  88. Basu S, Carney MA, Kenworthy NJ. Ten years after the financial crisis: the long reach of austerity and its global impacts on health. Soc Sci Med. 2017;187:203–7. · DOI
  89. Reeves A, McKee M, Stuckler D. ‘It’s the sun wot won it’: evidence of media influence on political attitudes and voting from a UK quasi-natural experiment. Soc Sci Res. 2016;56:44–57. · DOI
  90. Reeves A, Basu S, McKee M, Marmot MG, Stuckler D. Austere or not? UK coalition government budgets and health inequalities. J R Soc Med. 2013;106(11):432–6. · DOI
  91. Carney MA. ‘Sharing one’s destiny’: effects of austerity on migrant health provisioning in the Mediterranean borderlands. Soc Sci Med. 2017;187:251–8. · DOI
  92. Barlow P, McKee M, Basu S, Stuckler D. Impact of the north American free trade agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: a natural experiment using synthetic control methods. CMAJ. 2017;189(26):E881–7. · DOI · Paper page
  93. Mendez Lopez A, Loopstra R, McKee M, Stuckler D. Is trade liberalisation a vector for the spread of sugar-sweetened beverages? A cross-national longitudinal analysis of 44 low- and middle-income countries. Soc Sci Med. 2017;172:21–7. · DOI
  94. Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, Thomson S, Basu S, Stuckler D, et al. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1323–31. · DOI
  95. Kentikelenis AE. Structural adjustment and health: a conceptual framework and evidence on pathways. Soc Sci Med. 2017;187:296–305. · DOI
  96. Baker P, Kay A, Walls H. Trade and investment liberalization and Asia’s noncommunicable disease epidemic: a synthesis of data and existing literature. Glob Health. 2014;10:20. · DOI
  97. McNeill D, Birkbeck CD, Fukuda-Parr S, Grover A, Schrecker T, Stuckler D. Political origins of health inequities: trade and investment agreements. Lancet. 2017;389(10070):760–2. · DOI
  98. Lynch J. Reframing inequality? The health inequalities turn as a dangerous frame shift. J Public Health. 2017;39(4):653–60.
  99. Sassen S. Expulsions: brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge: Belknap Press; 2014. · DOI
  100. Sen A. Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. In: Grusky D, Kanbur R, editors. Poverty and inequality. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kentikelenis, A., & Rochford, C.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kentikelenis, Alexander
ORCID
Venue
Globalization and Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-11
Volume
15
Issue
S1
Pages
70-70
ISSN
1744-8603 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4
PMC
PMC6881908
OpenAlex
W2990061494
Cited by
48
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Globalization and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universitetet i Oslo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public health and occupational medicine
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
global health governance, power imbalance, health disparities, political economy of health, neoliberalism, global neoliberalism, international economic integration, conceptual framework
MeSH terms
Humans, Politics, Power, Psychological, Socioeconomic Factors, Global Health, Health Status Disparities, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review