Cited by 58Health Policy Implementation ScienceSchool Health and Nursing EducationLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Implementing school nursing strategies to reduce LGBTQ adolescent suicide: a randomized cluster trial study protocol

Open access
Willging, Cathleen E., Green, Amy E., Ramos, Mary M.·2016·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing youth suicide in the United States (U.S.) is a national public health priority, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) youth are at elevated risk. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) endorses six evidence-based (EB) strategies that center on meeting the needs of LGBTQ youth in schools; however, fewer than 6 % of U.S. schools implement all of them. The proposed intervention model, "RLAS" (Implementing School Nursing Strategies to Reduce LGBTQ Adolescent Suicide), builds on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) conceptual framework and the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) to implement EB strategies in U.S. high schools. The DAP accounts for the multilevel context of school settings and uses Implementation Resource Teams (IRTs) to facilitate appropriate expertise, advise on acceptable adaptations, and provide data feedback to make schools implementation ready and prepared to sustain changes. METHODS/DESIGN: Mixed methods will be used to examine individual, school, and community factors influencing both implementation process and youth outcomes. A cluster randomized controlled trial will assess whether LGBTQ students and their peers in RLAS intervention schools (n = 20) report reductions in suicidality, depression, substance use, bullying, and truancy related to safety concerns compared to those in usual care schools (n = 20). Implementation progress and fidelity for each EB strategy in RLAS intervention schools will be examined using a modified version of the Stages of Implementation Completion checklist. During the implementation and sustainment phases, annual focus groups will be conducted with the 20 IRTs to document their experiences identifying and advancing adaptation supports to facilitate use of EB strategies and their perceptions of the DAP. DISCUSSION: The DAP represents a data-informed, collaborative, multiple stakeholder approach to progress from exploration to sustainment and obtain fidelity during the implementation of EB strategies in school settings. This study is designed to address the real-world implications of enabling the use of EB strategies by school nurses with the goal of decreasing suicide and youth risk behaviors among LGBTQ youth. Through its participatory processes to refine and sustain EB strategies in high schools, the RLAS represents a novel contribution to implementation science. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02875535.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-016-0507-2

Cites

85 of 86 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that study, EPIS and DAP were used to inform constructs and measurement of implementation outcomes in the sustainment phase.

    “(4) inform the constructs and measurement of the implementation outcomes in the sustainment phase.”
  • In that study, EPIS and DAP were used to guide tracking and integration of adaptations to the EBP strategy training and delivery during the implementation phase.

    “(3) guide the tracking and integration of adaptations to the EBP strategy training and delivery during the implementation phase”
  • In that study, EPIS and DAP were used to support identification of stakeholders and activities involved in the Implementation Resource Team developed in the preparation phase.

    “(2) support the identification of the stakeholders and activities involved in the Implementation Resource Team that was developed in the preparation phase”
  • The EPIS framework and the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) were used in a cluster randomized trial to implement school nursing EBPs in US high schools to reduce LGBTQ adolescent suicide.

    “The EPIS framework and the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) were used in a cluster randomized trial to implement school nursing EBPs in US high schools to reduce LGBTQ adolescent suicide [68].”
  • In that study, EPIS and DAP were used to inform constructs measured in the multi-level needs assessment during the exploration phase.

    “Within this study, the EPIS framework and the DAP were used to (1) inform the constructs measured in the multi-level needs assessment during the exploration phase”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Aarons GA Clinician personality and attitudes toward adoption of empirically supported treatment. Presented at the 15th International Conference on Mental Health Services Research: Evidence in Mental Health Services Research: What Types, How Much, and Then What? 2002 Washington, DC National Institute of Mental Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willging, C. E., Green, A. E., & Ramos, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Willging, Cathleen E.
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2016-10-22
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
145-145
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2532583957
Cited by
58
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD083399)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
LGBTQ youth, adolescent suicide, school nursing, suicide prevention, EPIS framework, implementation fidelity, bullying, substance use, depression, truancy, high schools, youth risk behavior
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Bisexuality, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, New Mexico, Research Design, School Nursing, Suicide, Transsexualism, Cluster Analysis, Sexuality, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review