Incorporators, Early Investors, and Learners: a longitudinal study of organizational adaptation during EBP implementation and sustainment
Open accessAbstract
Background: The majority of literature on evidence-based practice (EBP) adaptation focuses on changes to clinical practices without explicitly addressing how organizations must adapt to accommodate a new EBP. This study explores the process of organizational—rather than EBP—adaptation during implementation and sustainment. To the authors’ knowledge, there are no previous implementation studies that focus on organizational adaptation in this way. Methods: This analysis utilizes a case study approach to examine longitudinal qualitative data from 17 community-based organizations (CBOs) in one state and seven county-based child welfare systems. The CBOs had sustained a child-neglect intervention EBP (SafeCare®) for 2 to 10 years. The unit of analysis was the organization, and each CBO represented a case. Organizational-level profiles were created to describe the organizational adaptation process. Results: Three organizational-level adaptation profiles were identified as follows: incorporators (n= 7), early investors (n= 6), and learners (n= 4). Incorporators adapted by integrating SafeCare into existing operations to meet contractual or EBP fidelity requirements. Early Investors made substantial organizational adaptations during the early implementation period, then operated relatively consistently as the EBP became embedded in the organization and service system. Learners were characterized by steady and continuous attention to new ways that the organization could adapt to support the EBP. Conclusion: The profiles demonstrated that there can be multiple effective paths to EBP sustainment. Organizational adaptation was calibrated to fit a CBO’s operations (e.g., size of the program) and immediate environmental constraints (e.g., funding levels). Additionally, organizations fulfilled different functional roles in the network of entities involved in EBP implementation. Knowing organizational roles and adaptation profiles can guide implementation planning and help to structure contract designs that bridge the outer (system) and inner (organizational) contexts. Adaptation profiles can also inform the intensity of the implementation strategy tailoring process and the way that strategies are marketed to organizations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 · Cited by 4,963 · see citing works
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240 · see citing works
Self-citationA theory of organizational readiness for change
Weiner, B. J. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 · Cited by 2,268 · see citing works
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225 · see citing works
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-17 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Baumann, A. A., & Miller, C. J. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y · Cited by 1,329 · see citing works
Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework
Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Rabin, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
Self-citationGlisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., Green, P., & The Research Network on Youth Mental Health (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Movsisyan, A., Arnold, L., Evans, R., Hallingberg, B., Moore, G., O’Cathain, A., Pfadenhauer, L. M., Segrott, J., & Rehfuess, E. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Bard, D., Silovsky, J. F., & Beasley, W. H. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1840 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Adaptation in Dissemination and Implementation Science
Baumann, A. A., Cabassa, L. J., & Stirman, S. W. (2017) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0017 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
von Thiele Schwarz, U., Aarons, G. A., & Hasson, H. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4668-y · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationWillging, C. E., Green, A. E., Gunderson, L., Chaffin, M., & Aarons, G. A. (2015) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559514547384 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kirk, J. W., Nilsen, P., Andersen, O., Stefánsdóttir, N. T., Grønfeldt, B., Brødsgaard, R., Pedersen, B. S., Bandholm, T., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., & Pedersen, M. M. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07142-4 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Another limitation is the lack of use of organizational-level profiles of the two departments [65].”
Background
- Authors
- Lengnick-Hall, R., Willging, C. E., Hurlburt, M. S., & Aarons, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aarons, Gregory A.
- Venue
- Implementation Science
- Published
- 2020-09-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-74
- ISSN
- 1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7488112
- OpenAlex
- W3083951844
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH113292, T32MH019960, R01MH07296, R01MH092950, R01MH072961, R03MH117493)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA038466)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01CE001556)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- organizational adaptation, evidence-based practice implementation, SafeCare, community organizations, child welfare system, organizational roles
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Organizations, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review