Cited by 21Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation

Adaptations and modifications to a co-designed intervention and its clinical implementation: a qualitative study in Denmark

Open access
Kirk, Jeanette Wassar, Nilsen, Per, Andersen, Ove, Stefánsdóttir, Nina Thórný, Grønfeldt, Birk, Brødsgaard, Rasmus, Pedersen, Britt Stævnsbo, Bandholm, Thomas +2 more·2021·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: There is a long-standing debate in implementation research on whether adaptations to evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are desirable in health care. If an intervention is adapted and not delivered as conceived and planned, it is said to have low fidelity. The WALK-Cph project was developed based on the assumption that involving stakeholders in co-design processes would facilitate the fidelity of an intervention to increase the mobility of acutely admitted older medical patients and its implementation in two hospitals in Denmark. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyse adaptations and modifications that were made to the co-designed WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation. Methods: This study used a qualitative design. An ethnographic field study was performed using participant observations, workshops and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed twice using the Framework Method. The first analysis was based on the frameworks from Stirman, Moore and Proctor. The second analysis, a retrospective modifications analysis, was based on the Adaptation-Impact Framework. Results: Many different types of adaptations and modifications were made to the WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation plan. Most of the modifications were made on the contents of the intervention. In total, 44 adaptations and modifications were made, of which 21 were planned (adaptations) and 23 were made haphazardly (modifications). Most of the content and context adaptations and modifications made on the intervention had a mixed result regarding enhanced fidelity. The retrospective modifications analysis showed that modifications were ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped. Conclusions: Although an extensive co-design process was carried out to facilitate the fidelity of the WALK-Cph intervention, this study showed that many adaptations and modifications were still made to both the intervention and its implementation plan. It could indicate that the co-design process had a small effect or that adaptations and modifications are ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped, which challenge the assumption and the desire to be able to plan and control changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-021-07142-4

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As Roper et al. (2022) did not assess the quality of PD-specific adaptations to psychotherapies in the included studies, it offered limited insight into their potential fit to the context in which practitioners will use the interventions.

    “Additionally, as the review did not assess the quality of PD-specific adaptations to psychotherapies in the included studies, it offered limited insight into their potential fit to the context in which practitioners will use the interventions (Kirk et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

15 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [47]Kvale S Brinkmann S InterView. introduktion til et håndværk. vol. 2. udgave 2009 København Hans Reitzels Forlag
  2. [61]Morse J Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research 2018 Den Zin and Lincoln SAGE Publications, Inc
  3. [77]Fonseca J Conplexity and innovations in organizations 2002 London and New York Routledge
  4. [82]Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. In: Hastrup K, editor. Samværet. Tilblivelse i tid og rum. I: Ind i Verden. En grundbog i antropologisk metode,Kap. 5. pp. 93-116. Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2.udgave, 1.oplag. vol. 2010. Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2010. ISBN-13: 978-87-412-2425-1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirk, J. W., Nilsen, P., Andersen, O., Stefánsdóttir, N. T., Grønfeldt, B., Brødsgaard, R., Pedersen, B. S., Bandholm, T., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., & Pedersen, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Amager Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Kirk, Jeanette Wassar
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2021-10-16
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1108-1108
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3207603336
Cited by
21
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Velux Fonden (F-21835-01-04-03)
  • Danske Fysioterapeuter (PD-2018-30-10)
  • Region Hovedstaden (P-2018-2-11)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
intervention adaptation, co-design, implementation fidelity, evidence-based interventions, older medical patients, mobility (physical function), acute hospital care, stakeholder engagement, clinical implementation, framework method
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Denmark, Humans, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review