Cited by 135Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPharmaceutical studies and practicesBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

A comprehensive study of the rare diseases and conditions targeted by orphan drug designations and approvals over the forty years of the Orphan Drug Act

Open access
Fermaglich, Lewis J., Miller, Kathleen L.·2023·Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Abstract

Background: Rare diseases affect more than 30 million Americans. The passage of the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) in the United States in 1983 represented a launching point for a rare disease drug development revolution for these patients. Financial incentives provided by the ODA through its Orphan Drug Designation Program, in addition to remarkable scientific advances over the past 40 years, have led to hundreds of drug approvals for rare diseases. Our research examines the rare diseases that have been targeted by orphan drug designations and subsequent approvals since the law was enacted. Methods: Using an internal FDA database, we classified and analyzed all orphan drug designations and approvals from 1983 to 2022 by disease and therapeutic area. Results: Over the 40 years of the ODA, 6,340 orphan drug designations were granted, representing drug development for 1,079 rare diseases. Additionally, 882 of those designations resulted in at least one FDA approval for use in 392 rare diseases. Much of this development has been concentrated in oncology as seven of the top ten most designated and approved diseases were rare cancers. Conclusions: Researchers have estimated that there may be 7000–10,000 rare diseases that have been identified and described. Based on our study, we can conclude that around 5% of rare diseases have an FDA-approved drug and up to 15% of rare diseases have at least one drug that has been developed and shown promise in their treatment, diagnosis or prevention. Funding of basic and translational science for rare disease drug development should continue in order to bring therapies to the millions of affected patients who remain without treatment options.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13023-023-02790-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Around 95% of rare diseases have no FDA-approved drugs and up to 85% of rare diseases do not have even one drug developed that would show promise in rare disease treatment, diagnosis or prevention.

    “Moreover, around 95% of rare diseases have no FDA-approved drugs and up to 85% of rare diseases do not have even one drug developed that would show promise in rare disease treatment, diagnosis or prevention21.”

    From A foundation model for clinician-centered drug repurposing (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The molecular basis of many rare diseases remains poorly understood.

    “For instance, the molecular basis of many rare diseases remains poorly understood21.”

    From A foundation model for clinician-centered drug repurposing (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fermaglich, L. J., & Miller, K. L.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Fermaglich, Lewis J.
Venue
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2023-06-23
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
163-163
ISSN
1750-1172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381839562
Cited by
134
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 7
FWCI
27.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
rare diseases, orphan drugs, Orphan Drug Act, orphan drug designation, drug approval, rare tumor, anticancer drug development, therapeutic areas, FDA drug approval, rare disease drug development
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Orphan Drug Production, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval, Rare Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review