Cited by 63Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

A novel systems biology approach to evaluate mouse models of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
the MODEL-AD Consortium, Preuss, Christoph, Pandey, Ravi, Piazza, Erin, Fine, Alexander, Uyar, Asli, Perumal, Thanneer, Garceau, Dylan +9 more·2020·Molecular Neurodegeneration

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) is the most common form of dementia worldwide. To date, animal models of Alzheimer’s have focused on rare familial mutations, due to a lack of frank neuropathology from models based on common disease genes. Recent multi-cohort studies of postmortem human brain transcriptomes have identified a set of 30 gene co-expression modules associated with LOAD, providing a molecular catalog of relevant endophenotypes. Results: This resource enables precise gene-based alignment between new animal models and human molecular signatures of disease. Here, we describe a new resource to efficiently screen mouse models for LOAD relevance. A new NanoString nCounter® Mouse AD panel was designed to correlate key human disease processes and pathways with mRNA from mouse brains. Analysis of the 5xFAD mouse, a widely used amyloid pathology model, and three mouse models based on LOAD genetics carrying APOE4 and TREM2*R47H alleles demonstrated overlaps with distinct human AD modules that, in turn, were functionally enriched in key disease-associated pathways. Comprehensive comparison with full transcriptome data from same-sample RNA-Seq showed strong correlation between gene expression changes independent of experimental platform. Conclusions: Taken together, we show that the nCounter Mouse AD panel offers a rapid, cost-effective and highly reproducible approach to assess disease relevance of potential LOAD mouse models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13024-020-00412-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These modules were grouped into five consensus clusters and annotated using Reactome, representing conserved AD-related molecular signatures across cohorts and brain regions.

    “These modules were grouped into five consensus clusters and annotated using Reactome, representing conserved AD‐related molecular signatures across cohorts and brain regions. 37 , 41 , 51”
  • The direction of the changes correlated with gene expression changes observed in human AD based on the AMP-AD modules.

    “The direction of the changes correlated with gene expression changes observed in human AD based on the AMP-AD modules (Preuss et al., 2020).”
  • Transcriptomic analyses of brain tissue from LOAD1.Plcg2M28L or LOAD1.Mthfr677C>T mice revealed increased alignment to brain transcriptomes from human patients with AD compared to B6 or LOAD1 controls.

    “Transcriptomic analyses of the brain tissue from LOAD1.Plcg2M28L or LOAD1.Mthfr677C > T mice revealed increased alignment to brain transcriptomes from human patients with AD compared to B6 or LOAD1 controls (Preuss et al., 2020).”

    From Plcg2M28L Interacts With High Fat/High Sugar Diet to Accelerate Alzheimer’s Disease-Relevant Phenotypes in Mice (2022) · cites this paper as Preuss et al., 2020

    The Results section describes comparing brain transcriptomes from APOE4 KI, Trem2*R47H, and combined-variant mice with human AD co-expression modules, including comparisons with B6 controls. Searches for LOAD1.Plcg2M28L and LOAD1.Mthfr677C>T found no passage reporting analyses of those mice or their increased alignment relative to B6 or LOAD1 controls. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]Mayeux R, Stern Y. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med [Internet]. 2012 Aug 1 [cited 2019 Jan 14];2(8). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22908189. PMC3405821 22908189
  2. [2]Zhang B Gaiteri C Bodea L-G Wang Z McElwee J Podtelezhnikov AA Integrated systems approach identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease Cell [Internet] 2013 153 3 707 720 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.030 PMC3677161 23622250 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Heuer SE, Neuner SM, Hadad N, O'Connell KMS, Williams RW, Philip VM, Gaiteri C, Kaczorowski CC. Identifying the molecular systems that influence cognitive resilience to Alzheimer's disease in genetically diverse mice. Learn Mem. 2020 27(9):355-371. Available from: 10.1101/lm.051839.120. PMC7433658 32817302 · DOI
  4. [4]Seyfried NT Dammer EB Swarup V Nandakumar D Duong DM Yin L A multi-network approach identifies protein-specific co-expression in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease Cell Syst [Internet] 2017 4 1 60 72 10.1016/j.cels.2016.11.006 PMC5269514 27989508 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Miller JA, Woltjer RL, Goodenbour JM, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med [Internet]. 2013;5, 48(5) [cited 2019 Jan 17] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705665. PMC3706780 23705665
  6. [6]Milind N Preuss C Haber A Ananda G Mukherjee S John C Transcriptomic stratification of late-onset Alzheimer’s cases reveals novel genetic modifiers of disease pathology. Barsh GS PLOS Genet [Internet] 2020 16 6 e1008775 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008775 PMC7295244 32492070 · DOI
  7. [7]Matarin M, Salih DA, Yasvoina M, Cummings DM, Guelfi S, Liu W, et al. A Genome-wide Gene-Expression Analysis and Database in Transgenic Mice during Development of Amyloid or Tau Pathology. Cell Rep [Internet]. 2015 Feb 3 [cited 2019 Jan 14];10(4):633–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620700. 25620700
  8. [11]Pandey RS, Graham L, Uyar A, Preuss C, Howell GR, Carter GW. Genetic perturbations of disease risk genes in mice capture transcriptomic signatures of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener [Internet]. 2019 Dec 26 [cited 2020 Sep 24];14(1):50. Available from: https://molecularneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13024-019-0351-3. PMC6933917 31878951 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [12]Allen M, Carrasquillo MM, Funk C, Heavner BD, Zou F, Younkin CS, et al. Human whole genome genotype and transcriptome data for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. Sci Data. 2016 3:160089. Available from: 10.1038/sdata.2016.89. PMC5058336 27727239 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]De Jager PL, Ma Y, McCabe C, Xu J, Vardarajan BN, Felsky D, et al. A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer’s disease research. Sci Data. 2018;5:180142. Available from: 10.1038/sdata.2018.142. PMC6080491 30084846 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]Wang M Beckmann ND Roussos P Wang E Zhou X Wang Q The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer’s disease Sci Data. 2018 5 180185 10.1038/sdata.2018.185 30204156 PMC6132187 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [17]Maiese K. Forkhead transcription factors: new considerations for alzheimer’s disease and dementia. J Transl Sci [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 22];2(4):241–7. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4932907/?report=abstract. PMC4932907 27390624
  13. [18]Fabregat A Sidiropoulos K Garapati P Gillespie M Hausmann K Haw R The reactome pathway knowledgebase Nucleic Acids Res 2016 44 D1 D481 D487 10.1093/nar/gkv1351 26656494 PMC4702931 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [21]Keren-Shaul H Spinrad A Weiner A Matcovitch-Natan O Dvir-Szternfeld R Ulland TK A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease Cell [Internet] 2017 169 7 1276 1290 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 28602351 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [22]Geschwind DH Rakic P Cortical evolution: judge the brain by its cover Neuron [Internet] 2013 80 3 633 647 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.045 PMC3922239 24183016 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [23]Bauernfeind AL Soderblom EJ Turner ME Moseley MA Ely JJ Hof PR Evolutionary Divergence of Gene and Protein Expression in the Brains of Humans and Chimpanzees Genome Biol Evol [Internet] 2015 7 8 2276 2288 10.1093/gbe/evv132 PMC4558850 26163674 · DOI
  17. [26]Rijpma A Jansen D Arnoldussen IAC Fang XT Wiesmann M Mutsaers MPC Sex Differences in Presynaptic Density and Neurogenesis in Middle-Aged ApoE4 and ApoE Knockout Mice J Neurodegener Dis [Internet] 2013 2013 531326 PMC4437335 26316992
  18. [27]Siegel JA Haley GE Raber J Apolipoprotein E isoform-dependent effects on anxiety and cognition in female TR mice Neurobiol Aging [Internet] 2012 33 2 345 358 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.03.002 PMC2935518 20400205 · DOI
  19. [28]Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS [Internet]. 2012 May [cited 2019 Jun 3];16(5):284–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22455463. PMC3339379 22455463
  20. [29]Boyle EI, Weng S, Gollub J, Jin H, Botstein D, Cherry JM, et al. GO::TermFinder--open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2004 Dec 12 [cited 2019 Jun 3];20(18):3710–5. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth456. PMC3037731 15297299 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [30]Altshcul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol [Internet]. 1990;215(3):403–10 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2231712. 2231712
  22. [31]Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2009 Jul 15 [cited 2013 Aug 6];25(14):1754–60. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2705234&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. PMC2705234 19451168
  23. [32]McKenna A Hanna M Banks E Sivachenko A Cibulskis K Kernytsky A The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data Genome Res 2010 20 9 1297 1303 10.1101/gr.107524.110 20644199 PMC2928508 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [33]Cingolani P Platts A Wang LL Coon M Nguyen T Wang L A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff Fly (Austin) [Internet] 2012 6 2 80 92 10.4161/fly.19695 PMC3679285 22728672 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [34]Ritchie ME Phipson B Wu D Hu Y Law CW Shi W limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies Nucleic Acids Res [Internet] 2015 43 7 e47 10.1093/nar/gkv007 PMC4402510 25605792 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [36]Bolger AM Lohse M Usadel B Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data Bioinformatics [Internet] 2014 30 15 2114 2120 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 PMC4103590 24695404 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [37]Dobin A Davis CA Schlesinger F Drenkow J Zaleski C Jha S STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner Bioinformatics [Internet] 2013 29 1 15 21 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 PMC3530905 23104886 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [38]Durinck S Moreau Y Kasprzyk A Davis S De Moor B Brazma A BioMart and bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis Bioinformatics [Internet] 2005 21 16 3439 3440 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti525 16082012 · DOI
  29. [39]Vilella AJ Severin J Ureta-Vidal A Heng L Durbin R Birney E EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates Genome Res [Internet] 2009 19 2 327 335 10.1101/gr.073585.107 PMC2652215 19029536 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
the MODEL-AD Consortium, Preuss, C., Pandey, R., Piazza, E., Fine, A., Uyar, A., Perumal, T., Garceau, D., Kotredes, K. P., Williams, H., Mangravite, L. M., Lamb, B. T., Oblak, A. L., Howell, G. R., Sasner, M., Logsdon, B. A., & Carter, G. W.
Affiliations
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • Nanostring Technologies (United States) (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Carter, Gregory W.
Venue
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Published
2020-11-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
67-67
ISSN
1750-1326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3104184392
Cited by
63
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U54 AG 054354)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
late-onset Alzheimer's disease, mouse models of Alzheimer's disease, gene co-expression modules, human brain transcriptome, 5xFAD mice, APOE ε4, amyloid pathology
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Microglia, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review