Cited by 20Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesVector-borne infectious diseasesViral Infections and Vectors

Detection of Leishmania infantum DNA and antibodies against Anaplasma spp.; Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Ehrlichia canis in a dog kennel in South-Central Romania

Open access
Cazan, Cristina Daniela, Ionică, Angela Monica, Matei, Ioana Adriana, D’Amico, Gianluca, Muñoz, Clara, Berriatua, Eduardo, Dumitrache, Mirabela Oana·2020·Acta veterinaria Scandinavica

Abstract

Canine vector-borne diseases are caused by pathogens transmitted by arthropods including ticks, mosquitoes and sand flies. Many canine vector-borne diseases are of zoonotic importance. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of vector-borne infections caused by Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in a dog kennel in Argeș County, Romania. Dog kennels are shelters for stray dogs with no officially registered owners that are gathered to be neutered and/or boarded for national/international adoptions by various public or private organizations. The international dog adoptions might represent a risk in the transmission of pathogens into new regions. In this context, a total number of 149 blood samples and 149 conjunctival swabs from asymptomatic kennel dogs were assessed using serology and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Antibodies against B. burgdorferi s.l. were detected in one dog (0.6%), anti-Anaplasma antibodies were found in five dogs (3.3%), while ten dogs (6.7%) tested positive for D. immitis antigen. Overall, 20.1% (30/149) of dogs were positive for L. infantum DNA. All samples were seronegative for anti-Leishmania antibodies. When adopting dogs from this region of Romania, owners should be aware of possible infection with especially L. infantum. The travel of infected dogs may introduce the infection to areas where leishmaniasis is not present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13028-020-00540-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The highest canine heartworm prevalence in Romania was in Galati, southeast, with 42.2% of studied dogs infected.

    “The highest prevalence was shown in Galati, in the southeast, 42.2% of the studied dogs being infected [78].”
  • More optimal conditions created by temperature increases allow the spread of mosquitoes to other areas where previously climatic conditions prevented their presence.

    “This has led to the creation of more optimal conditions that allow the spread of mosquitoes to other areas where previously the climatic conditions prevented their presence [1,55,78,166,167].”
  • In Romania, a GIS study demonstrated high risk of D. immitis infection in the southeast and moderate risk in the centre of the country due to favourable temperature and humidity for culicid mosquitoes; these regions were characterised by floodplains and had the highest canine prevalence, corroborating the validity of the prediction model.

    “A study of similar characteristics was carried out in Romania [78], where a high risk of infection in the southeast and moderate in the centre of the country were demonstrated, due to favourable temperature and humidity for the presence of culicid mosquitoes. These regions were characterised by floodplains; moreover, in these regions, the highest canine prevalence was found, corroborating the”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cazan, C. D., Ionică, A. M., Matei, I. A., D’Amico, G., Muñoz, C., Berriatua, E., & Dumitrache, M. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca (RO)
  • Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Corresponding author
Cazan, Cristina Daniela
Venue
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
42-42
ISSN
  • 0044-605X (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-0147
OpenAlex
W3047241578
Cited by
20
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta veterinaria Scandinavica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (TE299/2015, PD38/2018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
Keywords
canine vector-borne diseases, Leishmania infantum, canine leishmaniasis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma, Dirofilaria immitis, stray dogs, dog kennels, zoonotic transmission, seroprevalence, parasite DNA detection, conjunctival swabs, Argeș County
MeSH terms
Anaplasma, Anaplasmosis, Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Disease Vectors, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Lyme Disease, Male, Romania, Prevalence, DNA, Protozoan, Ehrlichiosis, Leishmania infantum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review