Cited by 103Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

Health systems context (s) for integrating mental health into primary health care in six Emerald countries: a situation analysis

Open access
Mugisha, James, Abdulmalik, Jibril, Hanlon, Charlotte, Petersen, Inge, Lund, Crick, Upadhaya, Nawaraj, Ahuja, Shalini, Shidhaye, Rahul +4 more·2017·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental, neurological and substance use disorders contribute to a significant proportion of the world's disease burden, including in low and middle income countries (LMICs). In this study, we focused on the health systems required to support integration of mental health into primary health care (PHC) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda. METHODS: A checklist guided by the World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS) was developed and was used for data collection in each of the six countries participating in the Emerging mental health systems in low and middle-income countries (Emerald) research consortium. The documents reviewed were from the following domains: mental health legislation, health policies/plans and relevant country health programs. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Three of the study countries (Ethiopia, Nepal, Nigeria, and Uganda) were working towards developing mental health legislation. South Africa and India were ahead of other countries, having enacted recent Mental Health Care Act in 2004 and 2016, respectively. Among all the 6 study countries, only Nepal, Nigeria and South Africa had a standalone mental health policy. However, other countries had related health policies where mental health was mentioned. The lack of fully fledged policies is likely to limit opportunities for resource mobilization for the mental health sector and efforts to integrate mental health into PHC. Most countries were found to be allocating inadequate budgets from the health budget for mental health, with South Africa (5%) and Nepal (0.17%) were the countries with the highest and lowest proportions of health budgets spent on mental health, respectively. Other vital resources that support integration such as human resources and health facilities for mental health services were found to be in adequate in all the study countries. Monitoring and evaluation systems to support the integration of mental health into PHC in all the study countries were also inadequate. CONCLUSION: Integration of mental health into PHC will require addressing the resource limitations that have been identified in this study. There is a need for up to date mental health legislation and policies to engender commitment in allocating resources to mental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13033-016-0114-2

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHMC). Strategies to support the integration of mental health into pediatric primary care Issue paper. Washington DC: NIHMC; 2009.
  2. World Health Organization. Assessment instrument for mental health systems. Geneva: WHO-AIMS; 2015.
  3. South Africa mental health care Act. No. 17 of 2002. vol. 449 Cape town.
  4. Ministry of Health and Population Nepal. Mental Health Treatment and Protection Act (Draft version). Kathmandu: Ministry of Health and Population; 2006.
  5. World Health Organization. Promoting mental health, concepts, emerging evidence and practice. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
  6. National Department of Health. National mental health policy framework and strategic plan, 2013–2020. Pretoria: National Department of Health; 2013.
  7. Ministry of Health and Population Nepal. Mental Health Treatment and Protection Act. Draft version. Kathmandu: National Ministryof Health and Population; 2006.
  8. Ministry of Health. Uganda draft national policy on mental, neurological and substance use services. Kampala: Ministry of Health; 2009.
  9. Ministry of Health. Uganda ministry of health policy. Kampala: Ministry of Health; 2010.
  10. World Health Organization. mhGAP intervention guide for mental neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings mental health gap action Programme (mhGAP). Geneva: WHO; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mugisha, J., Abdulmalik, J., Hanlon, C., Petersen, I., Lund, C., Upadhaya, N., Ahuja, S., Shidhaye, R., Mntambo, N., Alem, A., Gureje, O., & Kigozi, F.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Butabika Hospital (UG)
Corresponding author
Mugisha, James
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2017-01-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569231151
Cited by
103
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Union´s Seventh Framework Programme (no305968)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
mental health integration, primary care, mental health system, mental health law, health budget, monitoring and evaluation, low- and middle-income countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review