Cited by 135Mental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: a cross-country qualitative study

Open access
Lempp, H., Abayneh, S., Gurung, D., Kola, L., Abdulmalik, J., Evans-Lacko, S., Semrau, M., Alem, A. +2 more·2018·Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this paper are to: (i) explore the experiences of involvement of mental health service users, their caregivers, mental health centre heads and policy makers in mental health system strengthening in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (Ethiopia, Nepal and Nigeria); (ii) analyse the potential benefits and barriers of such involvement; and (iii) identify strategies required to achieve greater service user and caregiver participation. METHODS: A cross-country qualitative study was conducted, interviewing 83 stakeholders of mental health services. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that service user and caregiver involvement in the health system strengthening process was an alien concept for most participants. They reported very limited access to direct participation. Stigma and poverty were described as the main barriers for involvement. Several strategies were identified by participants to overcome existing hurdles to facilitate service user and caregiver involvement in the mental health system strengthening process, such as support to access treatment, mental health promotion and empowerment of service users. This study suggests that capacity building for service users, and strengthening of user groups would equip them to contribute meaningfully to policy development from informed perspectives. CONCLUSION: Involvement of service users and their caregivers in mental health decision-making is still in its infancy in LMICs. Effective strategies are required to overcome existing barriers, for example making funding more widely available for Ph.D. studies in participatory research with service users and caregivers to develop, implement and evaluate approaches to involvement that are locally and culturally acceptable in LMICs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s2045796017000634

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goodwin V, Happell B (2008). To be treated like a person: the role of the psychiatric nurse in promoting consumer and caregiver participation in mental health service delivery. International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and Research, 14, 1766– 1775.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lempp, H., Abayneh, S., Gurung, D., Kola, L., Abdulmalik, J., Evans-Lacko, S., Semrau, M., Alem, A., Thornicroft, G., & Hanlon, C.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Lempp, H.
Venue
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
29-39
ISSN
  • 2045-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7979
OpenAlex
W2767781105
Cited by
135
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
14.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
service user involvement, caregiver involvement, mental health system strengthening, mental health policy, low- and middle-income countries, stigma, poverty, barriers to participation, mental health promotion, user empowerment, participatory research, Ethiopia, Nepal, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Female, Health Personnel, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Participation, Poverty, Primary Health Care, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review