Cited by 27Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health services

Implementing an mhGAP-based training and supervision package to improve healthcare workers’ competencies and access to mental health care in Malawi

Open access
Ahrens, Jen, Kokota, Demoubly, Mafuta, Chitsanzo, Konyani, Mary, Chasweka, Dennis, Mwale, Owen, Stewart, Robert C., Osborn, Madeline +4 more·2020·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

Background: It is now well established that the integration of mental health care into primary care is one of the most effective ways of reducing the substantial treatment gap for mental disorders which exists in most low- and middle-income countries. This study set out to determine whether a Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) training and supervision package could be contextualised and implemented within the existing health care system in five districts in Southern Malawi. In addition, the study assessed the feasibility of holding community awareness events and establishing peer support groups in each district to further improve the access of the population to evidence-based mental health care. Methods: A lead training team of experienced Malawian mental health professionals was appointed and mhGAP training materials were contextualised for use in Malawi. The lead team delivered a 4-day training package to district mental health teams in five districts covering three core conditions: psychosis, moderate-severe depression, and alcohol and substance use disorders. District mental health teams then delivered a 2-day training package and provided monthly supervision for 3 months to 500 non-specialist healthcare workers. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare knowledge, confidence and attitude scores before and immediately after training, and after 6 months in two districts. Case detection rates measured pre- and post-training in the pilot district were compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Community awareness events were held and peer support groups were established in each of the five districts. The acceptability of the package was assessed through focus group discussions involving specialist and non-specialist healthcare workers, users and carers. Results: Non-specialist healthcare workers’ knowledge and confidence scores significantly increased immediately after training in comparison to pre-training. These scores were maintained at 6 months. However, no statistically significant change in attitude scores was detected. Case detection rates increased immediately after the training in comparison to pre-training. Responses from focus group discussion participants illustrated the programme’s acceptability. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that, with minimal additional funding and working within existing structures, an mhGAP based training at primary and secondary health care levels is feasible in Southern Malawi.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13033-020-00345-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [2]Vigo D Thornicroft G Atun R Estimating the true global burden of mental illness Lancet Psychiatry 2016 3 2 171 178 26851330
  2. [4]Jacob K Sharan P Mirza I Garrido-Cumbrera M Seedat S Mari J Mental health systems in countries: where are we now? Lancet 2007 370 9592 1061 1077 17804052
  3. [5]Nortje G Oladeji B Gureje O Seedat S Effectiveness of traditional healers in treating mental disorders: a systematic review Lancet Psychiatry 2016 3 2 154 170 26851329
  4. [6]Crabb J Stewart RC Kokota D Masson N Chabunya S Krishnadas R Attitudes towards mental illness in Malawi: a cross-sectional survey BMC Public Health 2012 12 1 541 546 22823941 PMC3413535
  5. [7]Chilale HK Silungwe ND Gondwe S Masulani-Mwale C Clients and carers perception of mental illness and factors that influence help-seeking: where they go first and why Int J Soc Psychiatry 2017 63 5 418 425 28604146
  6. [11]Lancet Global Mental Health Group Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action Lancet 2007 370 9594 1241 1252 17804059
  7. [12]Mental Health Gap Action Programme Scaling up care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders 2008 Geneva World Health Organization 26290926
  8. [13]Mental Health Gap Action Programme mhGAP Intervention Guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings, Version 2.0 2016 Geneva World Health Organization 27786430
  9. [16]Echeverri C Le Roy J Worku B Ventevogel P Mental health capacity building in refugee primary health care settings in Sub-Saharan Africa: impact, challenges and gaps Glob Ment Health 2018 5 e28 PMC6128042 30202535
  10. [21]Whiteford HA Ferrari AJ Degenhardt L Feigin V Vos T The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the global burden of disease study 2010 PLoS ONE 2015 10 2 1 14 PMC4320057 25658103
  11. [23]Mental Health Gap Action Programme mhGAP training manuals for the mhGAP Intervention Guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings- version 2.0 (for field testing) 2017 Geneva World Health Organization 27786430
  12. [24]Siriwardhana C Adikari A Van Bortel T McCrone P Sumathipala A An intervention to improve mental health care for conflict-affected forced migrants in low-resource primary care settings: a WHO MhGAP-based pilot study in Sri Lanka (COM-GAP study) Trials 2013 14 1 1 7 24321171 PMC3906999
  13. [27]Siriwardhana C Adikari A Jayaweera K Abeyrathna B Sumathipala A Integrating mental health into primary care for post-conflict populations: a pilot study Int J Ment Health Syst 2016 10 1 1 12 26925160 PMC4769532
  14. [28]Humayun A Haq I Khan FR Azad N Khan MM Weissbecker I Implementing mhGAP training to strengthen existing services for an internally displaced population in Pakistan Glob Ment Health 2017 PMC5454790 28596907
  15. [29]Wright J Chiwandira C Building capacity for community mental health care in rural Malawi: findings from a district-wide task-sharing intervention with village-based health workers Int J Soc Psychiatry 2016 62 6 589 596 27363860
  16. [30]Taylor SM Dear MJ Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill Schizophr Bull 1981 7 2 225 240 7280561
  17. [32]Barke A Nyarko S Klecha D The stigma of mental illness in Southern Ghana: attitudes of the urban population and patients’ views Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011 46 11 1191 1202 20872212 PMC3192946
  18. [34]Charlson F Chang O Kubuabola I Schess J Latu C Hunter E Implementation of the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) within the Fijian Healthcare System: a mixed-methods evaluation Int J Ment Health Syst 2019 13 1 1 10 31249611 PMC6585143
  19. [35]Saraceno B van Ommeren M Batniji R Cohen A Gureje O Mahoney J Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries Lancet 2007 370 9593 1164 1174 17804061
  20. [37]Faregh N Lencucha R Ventevogel P Dubale BW Kirmayer LJ Considering culture, context and community in mhGAP implementation and training: challenges and recommendations from the field Int J Ment Health Syst 2019 13 1 58 31462908 PMC6708207
  21. [38]Rowe AK Rowe SY Peters DH Holloway KA Chalker J Ross-Degnan D Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review Lancet Glob Health 2018 6 11 e1163 e1175 30309799 PMC6185992
  22. [39]Thornicroft G Mehta N Clement S Evans-Lacko S Doherty M Rose D Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination Lancet 2016 387 1123 1132 26410341

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahrens, J., Kokota, D., Mafuta, C., Konyani, M., Chasweka, D., Mwale, O., Stewart, R. C., Osborn, M., Chikasema, B., Mcheka, M., Blackwood, D., & Gilfillan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Malawi (MW)
  • Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Kokota, Demoubly
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2020-02-27
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
11-11
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011109773
Cited by
27
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Scottish Government through a Malawi Development Grant entitled Enhancing Mental Health Training (SC039523)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
Mental Health Gap Action Programme, mental health workforce training, integration of mental health into primary care, psychosis, depression, alcohol and substance use disorders, case finding, peer support groups, acceptability, access to mental health care, southern Malawi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review