Cited by 515Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Schmutzi: estimation of contamination and endogenous mitochondrial consensus calling for ancient DNA

Open access

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Ancient DNA is typically highly degraded with appreciable cytosine deamination, and contamination with present-day DNA often complicates the identification of endogenous molecules. Together, these factors impede accurate assembly of the endogenous ancient mitochondrial genome. We present schmutzi, an iterative approach to jointly estimate present-day human contamination in ancient human DNA datasets and reconstruct the endogenous mitochondrial genome. By using sequence deamination patterns and fragment length distributions, schmutzi accurately reconstructs the endogenous mitochondrial genome sequence even when contamination exceeds 50 %. Given sufficient coverage, schmutzi also produces reliable estimates of contamination across a range of contamination rates. AVAILABILITY: https://bioinf.eva.mpg.de/schmutzi/ license:GPLv3.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-015-0776-0

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of mitochondrial sequences from an ancient DNA library. When DNA from an ancient human sample is sequenced, DNA from the ancient human (endogenous fragments represented in green) as well as contaminant DNA fragments from the individuals who have handled the bone (contaminating fragments represented in red) are included. Because DNA undergoes deamination over time, endogenous fragments are likely to carry deaminated cytosines (represented as T’s in a blue frame), particularly near the ends of the DNA fragments. The non-deaminated cytosines are represented as unframed blue C’s. Schmutzi first identifies the endogenous fragments and, in a second step, uses these to quantify contamination. These steps are repeated until convergence is achieved and a single mitochondrial genome is identified
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of mitochondrial sequences from an ancient DNA library. When DNA from an ancient human sample is sequenced, DNA from the ancient human (endogenous fragments represented in green) as well as contaminant DNA fragments from the individuals who have handled the bone (contaminating fragments represented in red) are included. Because DNA undergoes deamination over time, endogenous fragments are likely to carry deaminated cytosines (represented as T’s in a blue frame), particularly near the ends of the DNA fragments. The non-deaminated cytosines are represented as unframed blue C’s. Schmutzi first identifies the endogenous fragments and, in a second step, uses these to quantify contamination. These steps are repeated until convergence is achieved and a single mitochondrial genome is identifiedCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Schmutzi workflow. An initial contamination estimate is computed using the deamination rates of fragments by conditioning on the other end being deaminated and comparing these to the deamination rate of all fragments in the dataset (contDeam). This prior is provided to call an endogenous consensus (endoCaller). The consensus call is, in turn, used to re-estimate mitochondrial contamination (mtCont). Deamination rates and fragment length distributions are measured for fragments that support endogenous and contaminant mitochondrial genomes (splitEndo). The information from mtCont and splitEndo is used as input for re-calling the endogenous consensus (endoCaller). This cycle is repeated until a stable contamination rate is reached. db database
Fig. 2 Schmutzi workflow. An initial contamination estimate is computed using the deamination rates of fragments by conditioning on the other end being deaminated and comparing these to the deamination rate of all fragments in the dataset (contDeam). This prior is provided to call an endogenous consensus (endoCaller). The consensus call is, in turn, used to re-estimate mitochondrial contamination (mtCont). Deamination rates and fragment length distributions are measured for fragments that support endogenous and contaminant mitochondrial genomes (splitEndo). The information from mtCont and splitEndo is used as input for re-calling the endogenous consensus (endoCaller). This cycle is repeated until a stable contamination rate is reached. db databaseCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Effect of increasing contamination on endogenous genome sequence reconstruction and contaminant genome sequence reconstruction of simulated data. Accuracy of the ancient (a) and present-day contaminant (b) mitochondrial consensus sequences produced by schmutzi on simulated data for an early modern human, a Neanderthal and a Denisovan mitochondrial genome. We define an error as either a mismatch or an indel between the predicted endogenous sequence and the published mitochondrial sequence used for simulations. As contamination increases, inference of the endogenous mitochondrial genome becomes more difficult (a). In contrast, the prediction of the contaminant genome becomes more accurate at higher levels of present-day human contamination (b)
Fig. 3 Effect of increasing contamination on endogenous genome sequence reconstruction and contaminant genome sequence reconstruction of simulated data. Accuracy of the ancient (a) and present-day contaminant (b) mitochondrial consensus sequences produced by schmutzi on simulated data for an early modern human, a Neanderthal and a Denisovan mitochondrial genome. We define an error as either a mismatch or an indel between the predicted endogenous sequence and the published mitochondrial sequence used for simulations. As contamination increases, inference of the endogenous mitochondrial genome becomes more difficult (a). In contrast, the prediction of the contaminant genome becomes more accurate at higher levels of present-day human contamination (b)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Consensus call and contamination estimate accuracy for empirical datasets. a The htslib consensus call (yellow) and the schmutzi consensus call (red) were performed on a subset of the data from three Neanderthals, one Denisovan and one early modern human. The number of mismatches between the mitochondrial consensus sequence and the published mitochondrial genome from the same individual was calculated. b Contamination was estimated using schmutzi (red) and contamMix v.1.0-10 (blue) and compared to the contamination computed using diagnostic positions (gray per fragment and black per base). For the two Mezmaiskaya individuals, the endogenous genome used for comparison was obtained using another library with low levels of contamination from the same individual. diag pos diagnostic position, Nean Neanderthal
Fig. 4 Consensus call and contamination estimate accuracy for empirical datasets. a The htslib consensus call (yellow) and the schmutzi consensus call (red) were performed on a subset of the data from three Neanderthals, one Denisovan and one early modern human. The number of mismatches between the mitochondrial consensus sequence and the published mitochondrial genome from the same individual was calculated. b Contamination was estimated using schmutzi (red) and contamMix v.1.0-10 (blue) and compared to the contamination computed using diagnostic positions (gray per fragment and black per base). For the two Mezmaiskaya individuals, the endogenous genome used for comparison was obtained using another library with low levels of contamination from the same individual. diag pos diagnostic position, Nean NeanderthalCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Contamination estimates and phylogenetic placement of Mezmaiskaya 1 (library ID B9687). a The posterior probability distribution for contamination in Mezmaiskaya 1. The dotted line represents the estimate obtained using an ad hoc method based on fixed sites. b A maximum-likelihood tree showing the placement of the mitochondrial genome of Mezmaiskaya 1 (labeled MT in the tree) and the inferred contaminant (labeled MTc in the tree), compared to 20 present-day humans and nine archaic humans
Fig. 5 Contamination estimates and phylogenetic placement of Mezmaiskaya 1 (library ID B9687). a The posterior probability distribution for contamination in Mezmaiskaya 1. The dotted line represents the estimate obtained using an ad hoc method based on fixed sites. b A maximum-likelihood tree showing the placement of the mitochondrial genome of Mezmaiskaya 1 (labeled MT in the tree) and the inferred contaminant (labeled MTc in the tree), compared to 20 present-day humans and nine archaic humansCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Simulated versus measured contamination rates. Several sets contained simulated aDNA fragments from a mitochondrial genome belonging to an early modern human (left), a Neanderthal (middle) or a Denisovan (right). All simulated sets had damage patterns associated with a single-stranded library protocol. The double-stranded figure can be found in Additional file 1: Results. A contaminating present-day human was pooled together at various rates to simulate contamination. The dotted black line represents a perfect prediction, and blue dots are the predicted rates of contamination by schmutzi once convergence was achieved. The red dots represent sets for which the algorithm stopped prematurely due to lack of information about the contaminant fragments. The black whiskers represent the 95 % confidence interval for contamination
Fig. 6 Simulated versus measured contamination rates. Several sets contained simulated aDNA fragments from a mitochondrial genome belonging to an early modern human (left), a Neanderthal (middle) or a Denisovan (right). All simulated sets had damage patterns associated with a single-stranded library protocol. The double-stranded figure can be found in Additional file 1: Results. A contaminating present-day human was pooled together at various rates to simulate contamination. The dotted black line represents a perfect prediction, and blue dots are the predicted rates of contamination by schmutzi once convergence was achieved. The red dots represent sets for which the algorithm stopped prematurely due to lack of information about the contaminant fragments. The black whiskers represent the 95 % confidence interval for contaminationCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Robustness of the contamination estimate to lower coverage. The simulated dataset with a contamination rate of ∼47 % and single-stranded deamination patterns was subsampled at various coverages from 0 to 1250 ×. Top: Contamination rates were estimated across a range of coverages in simulated data for a Neanderthal, a Denisovan and an early modern human (Ust’-Ishim). Bottom: Contamination estimates when a high-quality mtDNA sequence from a closely related individual is used as the endogenous genome. Robust estimates can be made down to 5 × coverage even at 47 % contamination. For the early modern human, the contamination estimate provided was computed using the database alone and not the prediction of the contaminant genome thus leading to underestimates (see Table 4 for an example of the effect of using the predicted contaminant in the contamination estimate)
Fig. 7 Robustness of the contamination estimate to lower coverage. The simulated dataset with a contamination rate of ∼47 % and single-stranded deamination patterns was subsampled at various coverages from 0 to 1250 ×. Top: Contamination rates were estimated across a range of coverages in simulated data for a Neanderthal, a Denisovan and an early modern human (Ust’-Ishim). Bottom: Contamination estimates when a high-quality mtDNA sequence from a closely related individual is used as the endogenous genome. Robust estimates can be made down to 5 × coverage even at 47 % contamination. For the early modern human, the contamination estimate provided was computed using the database alone and not the prediction of the contaminant genome thus leading to underestimates (see Table 4 for an example of the effect of using the predicted contaminant in the contamination estimate)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 515

Metadata

Authors
Renaud, G., Slon, V., Duggan, A. T., & Kelso, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Renaud, Gabriel
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2015-10-12
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
224-224
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2099595226
Cited by
509
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGSD2-438066-2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
ancient DNA, contamination estimation, cytosine deamination, endogenous DNA, fragment size distribution
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Software, Consensus Sequence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genome, Mitochondrial, DNA Contamination, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review