Cited by 24Gene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

CellMapper: rapid and accurate inference of gene expression in difficult-to-isolate cell types

Open access
Nelms, Bradlee D., Waldron, Levi, Barrera, Luis A., Weflen, Andrew W., Goettel, Jeremy A., Guo, Guoji, Montgomery, Robert K., Neutra, Marian R. +6 more·2016·Genome biology

Abstract

We present a sensitive approach to predict genes expressed selectively in specific cell types, by searching publicly available expression data for genes with a similar expression profile to known cell-specific markers. Our method, CellMapper, strongly outperforms previous computational algorithms to predict cell type-specific expression, especially for rare and difficult-to-isolate cell types. Furthermore, CellMapper makes accurate predictions for human brain cell types that have never been isolated, and can be rapidly applied to diverse cell types from many tissues. We demonstrate a clinically relevant application to prioritize candidate genes in disease susceptibility loci identified by GWAS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-016-1062-5

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advances in cell-type expression profiling have enabled the identification of cell-type-specific gene expression profiles.

    “Beyond the identification of specific microglial markers, advances in cell-type expression profiling have enabled the identification of cell-type-specific gene expression profiles (10).”
  • CellMapper requires only a single cell marker and a smaller training dataset than other techniques, and enables analysis of expression data derived from bulk brain tissue samples.

    “The technique we chose, CellMapper, requires only a single cell marker and a smaller training dataset than other techniques, and enables analysis of expression data derived from bulk brain tissue samples (10).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelms, B. D., Waldron, L., Barrera, L. A., Weflen, A. W., Goettel, J. A., Guo, G., Montgomery, R. K., Neutra, M. R., Breault, D. T., Snapper, S. B., Orkin, S. H., Bulyk, M. L., Huttenhower, C., & Lencer, W. I.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nelms, Bradlee D.
  • Lencer, Wayne I.
Venue
Genome biology
Published
2016-09-29
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
201-201
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2527229715
Cited by
24
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 DK084424, R01 DK048106, P30 DK034854, R01 HG003985)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
cell type-specific gene expression, cell type markers, rare cell types, gene expression prediction, candidate gene prioritization
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Immune System, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Spleen, Reproducibility of Results, Caco-2 Cells, Computational Biology, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Gene Expression Profiling, Endothelial Cells, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review