The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of CHROMOMETHYLASES and gene body DNA methylation in plants
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The evolution of gene body methylation (gbM), its origins, and its functional consequences are poorly understood. By pairing the largest collection of transcriptomes (>1000) and methylomes (77) across Viridiplantae, we provide novel insights into the evolution of gbM and its relationship to CHROMOMETHYLASE (CMT) proteins. RESULTS: CMTs are evolutionary conserved DNA methyltransferases in Viridiplantae. Duplication events gave rise to what are now referred to as CMT1, 2 and 3. Independent losses of CMT1, 2, and 3 in eudicots, CMT2 and ZMET in monocots and monocots/commelinids, variation in copy number, and non-neutral evolution suggests overlapping or fluid functional evolution of this gene family. DNA methylation within genes is widespread and is found in all major taxonomic groups of Viridiplantae investigated. Genes enriched with methylated CGs (mCG) were also identified in species sister to angiosperms. The proportion of genes and DNA methylation patterns associated with gbM are restricted to angiosperms with a functional CMT3 or ortholog. However, mCG-enriched genes in the gymnosperm Pinus taeda shared some similarities with gbM genes in Amborella trichopoda. Additionally, gymnosperms and ferns share a CMT homolog closely related to CMT2 and 3. Hence, the dependency of gbM on a CMT most likely extends to all angiosperms and possibly gymnosperms and ferns. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting gene family phylogeny of CMT transcripts from the most diverse sampling of plants to date redefines our understanding of CMT evolution and its evolutionary consequences on DNA methylation. Future, functional tests of homologous and paralogous CMTs will uncover novel roles and consequences to the epigenome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals
Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P.-Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S. H., Halpern, M. E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002720107 · Cited by 1,285
Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants
Wickett, N. J., Mirarab, S., Nguyen, N., Warnow, T., Carpenter, E., Matasci, N., Ayyampalayam, S., Barker, M. S., Burleigh, J. G., Gitzendanner, M. A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323926111 · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationDNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation
Du, J., Johnson, L. M., Jacobsen, S. E., & Patel, D. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4043 · Cited by 1,000
Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation
Schultz, M. D., He, Y., Whitaker, J. W., Hariharan, M., Mukamel, E. A., Leung, D., Rajagopal, N., Nery, J. R., Urich, M. A., Chen, H., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14465 · Cited by 690
Cited by
The Physcomitrella patens chromosome‐scale assembly reveals moss genome structure and evolution
Lang, D., Ullrich, K. K., Murat, F., Fuchs, J., Jenkins, J., Haas, F. B., Piednoel, M., Gundlach, H., Van Bel, M., Meyberg, R., et al. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13801 · Cited by 423
Gene body DNA methylation in plants
Bewick, A. J., & Schmitz, R. J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2016.12.007 · Cited by 409
Self-citationErdmann, R. M., & Picard, C. L. (2020) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009034 · Cited by 389
How Stress Facilitates Phenotypic Innovation Through Epigenetic Diversity
Srikant, T., & Drost, H.-G. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.606800 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Bewick, A. J., Niederhuth, C. E., Ji, L., Rohr, N. A., Griffin, P. T., Leebens-Mack, J., & Schmitz, R. J.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2017-05-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-65
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2952286808
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of CHROMOMETHYLASES and gene body DNA methylation in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13059-017-1195-1
- The paper
- Bewick, A. J., Niederhuth, C. E., Ji, L., Rohr, N. A., Griffin, P. T., Leebens-Mack, J., & Schmitz, R. J. (2017). The evolution of CHROMOMETHYLASES and gene body DNA methylation in plants. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1195-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.