Cited by 28Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

FixItFelix: improving genomic analysis by fixing reference errors

Open access
Behera, Sairam, LeFaive, Jonathon, Orchard, Peter, Mahmoud, Medhat, Paulin, Luis F., Farek, Jesse, Soto, Daniela C., Parker, Stephen C. J. +4 more·2023·Genome Biology

Abstract

The current version of the human reference genome, GRCh38, contains a number of errors including 1.2 Mbp of falsely duplicated and 8.04 Mbp of collapsed regions. These errors impact the variant calling of 33 protein-coding genes, including 12 with medical relevance. Here, we present FixItFelix, an efficient remapping approach, together with a modified version of the GRCh38 reference genome that improves the subsequent analysis across these genes within minutes for an existing alignment file while maintaining the same coordinates. We showcase these improvements over multi-ethnic control samples, demonstrating improvements for population variant calling as well as eQTL studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-023-02863-7

Cites

43 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 12 medically important genes underrepresented on GRCh38 comprise 9 that are incorrectly duplicated and 3 that are incorrectly collapsed.

    “These 12 genes comprise 9 that are incorrectly duplicated and 3 that are incorrectly collapsed (for example, two instead of three copies).”

    From Comprehensive genome analysis and variant detection at scale using DRAGEN (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion says false duplications affected 12 medically relevant genes, rather than nine. The Results (Identification of GRCh38 errors) separately identify three medically relevant genes selected from collapsed regions; they do not describe those three as part of a 12-gene group split nine and three. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For MAP2K3 and KCNJ18, GATK discovered 487 more variants than DRAGEN, which are likely false positives.

    “For MAP2K3, which is related to skin and liver diseases67, and KCNJ18, which is related to other rare diseases68, GATK discovered 487 more variants than DRAGEN, which are likely false positives23 (Supplementary Table 11).”

    From Comprehensive genome analysis and variant detection at scale using DRAGEN (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results (General improvements of variant calling; The modified reference improves variant detection across ancestries) report improved variant-call accuracy in regions containing MAP2K3 and KCNJ18, consistent with erroneous calls in those regions. But the paper compares GATK calls before and after reference modification, not GATK with DRAGEN; it does not substantiate the figure of 487 additional variants or identify those particular variants as likely false positives. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several medically relevant genes are wrongly represented in the GRCh38 reference due to false duplication and collapsed sequence errors.

    “Moreover, several of these medically relevant genes (for example, KCNE1, CBS, CRYAA, KCNJ18, MAP2K3, KMT2C) are wrongly represented in the GRCh38 reference due to false duplication and collapsed sequence errors23.”
  • Several genes have been wrongly reported multiple times across the genome, which often leads to missing variant calls due to their repetitiveness.

    “On the other hand, there are several genes that have been wrongly reported multiple times across the genome, which often leads to missing variant calls due to their repetitiveness23.”
  • Within medically relevant genes, there are 12 genes that are often negatively impacted by reference bias.

    “Within these medically relevant genes, there are 12 genes that are often negatively impacted by reference bias23.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [44]Zook, JM. Challenging medically relevant genes small variant and SV benchmarks in HG002. Datasets. 2021. https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/giab/ftp/release/AshkenazimTrio/HG002_NA24385_son/CMRG_v1.00/GRCh38/SmallVariant/.
  2. [45]Zook, JM. GRCh38 reference. Datasets. 2022. https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ReferenceSamples/giab/release/references/GRCh38/GCA_000001405.15_GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set.fasta.gz.
  3. [48]Zook, JM. HG002 HiFiasm assembly. Datasets. 2022. https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/giab/ftp/release/AshkenazimTrio/HG002_NA24385_son/CMRG_v1.00/hifiasm-assembly/.
  4. [51]B, Gunjan, HG002 WES high-confidence BED regions. Datasets. 2022. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2020/12/16/2020.12.15.356360/DC2/embed/media-2.gz?download=true.
  5. [53]Zook, JM. Genome stratifications. Datasets. 2022. https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ReferenceSamples/giab/release/genome-stratifications/v3.0/GRCh38/FunctionalRegions/GRCh38_refseq_cds.bed.gz.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behera, S., LeFaive, J., Orchard, P., Mahmoud, M., Paulin, L. F., Farek, J., Soto, D. C., Parker, S. C. J., Smith, A. V., Dennis, M. Y., Zook, J. M., & Sedlazeck, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zook, Justin M.
  • Sedlazeck, Fritz J.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2023-02-21
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
31-31
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W4321460043
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Rice Research Repository (Rice University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG008898, 1U01HG011758-01)
  • NHLBI Division of Intramural Research (HHSN268201800002I)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01 AG058589)
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (DP2MH119424)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
GRCh38, remapping, variant calling, protein-coding genes, expression quantitative trait loci, human genome
MeSH terms
Humans, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review